IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i7-8p983-993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participants' perceptions of an intervention implemented in an Action Research Nursing Documentation Project

Author

Listed:
  • Grete Vabo
  • Åshild Slettebø
  • Mariann Fossum

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim of this study is to describe healthcare professionals’ experiences and perceptions of an intervention implemented in an action research project conducted to improve nursing documentation practices in four municipalities in Norway. Background Documentation of individualized patient care is a continuing concern in healthcare services and could impacts the quality and safety of healthcare. Use of electronic systems has made some aspects of documentation more comprehensive, but creation of an individualized care plan remains a pressing issue. Design A qualitative descriptive design was used. Methods An action research project was conducted between 2010–2012 to improve the content and quality of nursing documentation in community healthcare services in four municipalities. One year after the project was completed four focus group interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals, one for each involved municipality. Two unit managers were interviewed individually. Qualitative content analysis was used. Results Three themes emerged: healthcare professionals perceived competing interest; they experienced that they had to manage complexity and changes; and they highlighted a clear and visible leader as important for success. Conclusions Quality improvement activities are essential. Healthcare professionals experience a complicated situation when electronic health record systems do not support workflow. Further research is recommended to focus on the functionality and user interface of electronic health record systems, and on the role of leadership when implementing changes in clinical practice. Relevance to clinical practice Stronger cooperation among policymakers, electronic health record system vendors, and healthcare professionals is essential for improving electronic health record systems and documentation practices. Involvement of end‐users in these improvements can make a difference in the way the systems are perceived in the clinical workflow.

Suggested Citation

  • Grete Vabo & Åshild Slettebø & Mariann Fossum, 2017. "Participants' perceptions of an intervention implemented in an Action Research Nursing Documentation Project," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(7-8), pages 983-993, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:7-8:p:983-993
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13389
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edith R Gjevjon & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2010. "The quality of home care nurses’ documentation in new electronic patient records," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1‐2), pages 100-108, January.
    2. Melanie Bish & Amanda Kenny & Rhonda Nay, 2013. "Using participatory action research to foster nurse leadership in Australian rural hospitals," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 286-291, September.
    3. Heleena Laitinen & Marja Kaunonen & Päivi Åstedt‐Kurki, 2010. "Patient‐focused nursing documentation expressed by nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3‐4), pages 489-497, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabeth Østensen & Nicholas R. Hardiker & Line Kildal Bragstad & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2020. "Introducing standardised care plans as a new recording tool in municipal health care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3286-3297, September.
    2. Sigrun Aasen Frigstad & Torunn Hatlen Nøst & Beate André, 2015. "Implementation of Free Text Format Nursing Diagnoses at a University Hospital’s Medical Department. Exploring Nurses’ and Nursing Students’ Experiences on Use and Usefulness. A Qualitative Study," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-11, May.
    3. Kjellaug K. Myklebust & Stål Bjørkly & Målfrid Råheim, 2018. "Nursing documentation in inpatient psychiatry: The relevance of nurse–patient interactions in progress notes—A focus group study with mental health staff," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 611-622, February.
    4. Elisabeth Østensen & Line Kildal Bragstad & Nicholas R. Hardiker & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2019. "Nurses' information practice in municipal health care—A web‐like landscape," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2706-2716, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:7-8:p:983-993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.