IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i3-4pe611-e622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing documentation in inpatient psychiatry: The relevance of nurse–patient interactions in progress notes—A focus group study with mental health staff

Author

Listed:
  • Kjellaug K. Myklebust
  • Stål Bjørkly
  • Målfrid Råheim

Abstract

Aims and objectives To gain insight into mental health staff's perception of writing progress notes in an acute and subacute psychiatric ward context. Background The nursing process structures nursing documentation. Progress notes are intended to be an evaluation of a patient's nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes. Within this template, a patient's status and the care provided are to be recorded. The therapeutic nurse–patient relationship is recognised as a key component of psychiatric care today. At the same time, the biomedical model remains strong. Research literature exploring nursing staff's experiences with writing progress notes in psychiatric contexts, and especially the space given to staff–patient relations, is sparse. Design Qualitative design. Methods Focus group interviews with mental health staff working in one acute and one subacute psychiatric ward were conducted. Systematic text condensation, a method for transverse thematic analysis, was used. Results Two main categories emerged from the analysis: the position of the professional as an expert and distant observer in the progress notes, and the weak position of professional–patient interactions in progress notes. Conclusions The participants did not perceive that the current recording model, which is based on the nursing process, supported a focus on patients’ resources or reporting professional–patient interactions. This model appeared to put ward staff in an expert position in relation to patients, which made it challenging to involve patients in the recording process. Essential aspects of nursing care related to recovery and person‐centred care were not prioritised for documentation. Relevance to clinical practice This study contributes to the critical examination of the documentation praxis, as well as to the critical examination of the documentation tool as to what is considered important to document.

Suggested Citation

  • Kjellaug K. Myklebust & Stål Bjørkly & Målfrid Råheim, 2018. "Nursing documentation in inpatient psychiatry: The relevance of nurse–patient interactions in progress notes—A focus group study with mental health staff," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 611-622, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:e611-e622
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edith R Gjevjon & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2010. "The quality of home care nurses’ documentation in new electronic patient records," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1‐2), pages 100-108, January.
    2. Maria Grazia De Marinis & Michela Piredda & Maria Chiara Pascarella & Bruno Vincenzi & Fiorenza Spiga & Daniela Tartaglini & Rosaria Alvaro & Maria Matarese, 2010. "‘If it is not recorded, it has not been done!’? consistency between nursing records and observed nursing care in an Italian hospital," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1544-1552, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Ameel & Hanna Leino & Raija Kontio & Theo van Achterberg & Kristiina Junttila, 2020. "Using the Nursing Interventions Classification to identify nursing interventions in free‐text nursing documentation in adult psychiatric outpatient care setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3435-3444, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriella Facchinetti & Andrea Ianni & Michela Piredda & Anna Marchetti & Daniela D’Angelo & Ivziku Dhurata & Maria Matarese & Maria Grazia De Marinis, 2019. "Discharge of older patients with chronic diseases: What nurses do and what they record. An observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1719-1727, May.
    2. Grete Vabo & Åshild Slettebø & Mariann Fossum, 2017. "Participants' perceptions of an intervention implemented in an Action Research Nursing Documentation Project," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(7-8), pages 983-993, April.
    3. Gitte Bunkenborg & Lars Smith‐Hansen & Ingrid Poulsen, 2019. "Implementing mandatory early warning scoring impacts nurses’ practice of documenting free text notes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2990-3000, August.
    4. Elisabeth Østensen & Nicholas R. Hardiker & Line Kildal Bragstad & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2020. "Introducing standardised care plans as a new recording tool in municipal health care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3286-3297, September.
    5. Sigrun Aasen Frigstad & Torunn Hatlen Nøst & Beate André, 2015. "Implementation of Free Text Format Nursing Diagnoses at a University Hospital’s Medical Department. Exploring Nurses’ and Nursing Students’ Experiences on Use and Usefulness. A Qualitative Study," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-11, May.
    6. Sandra Braaf & Robin Riley & Elizabeth Manias, 2015. "Failures in communication through documents and documentation across the perioperative pathway," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1874-1884, July.
    7. Elisabeth Østensen & Line Kildal Bragstad & Nicholas R. Hardiker & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2019. "Nurses' information practice in municipal health care—A web‐like landscape," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2706-2716, July.
    8. Linda Høgsnes & Ella Danielson & Karl‐Gustaf Norbergh & Christina Melin‐Johansson, 2016. "Healthcare professionals' documentation in nursing homes when caring for patients with dementia in end of life – a retrospective records review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(11-12), pages 1663-1673, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:e611-e622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.