IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i5-6p1209-1215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the factors which promote registered nurses’ intent to stay in emergency and critical care areas

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Van Osch
  • Kathy Scarborough
  • Sarah Crowe
  • Angela C. Wolff
  • Sheryl Reimer‐Kirkham

Abstract

Aims and Objective To explore the influential factors and strategies that promote an experienced nurse's intent to stay in their emergency or critical care area. Background Turnover among registered nurses (herein referred to as nurses) working in specialty areas of practice can result in a range of negative outcomes. The retention of specialty nurses at the unit level has important implications for hospital and health systems. These implications include lost knowledge and experience which may in turn impact staff performance levels, patient outcomes, hiring, orientating, development of clinical competence and other aspects of organizational performance. Design This qualitative study used an interpretive descriptive design to understand nurses’ perceptions of the current factors and strategies that promote them staying in emergency or critical care settings for two or more years. Methods Focus groups were conducted with 13 emergency and critical care nurses. Data analysis involved thematic analysis that evolved from codes to categories to themes. Results Four themes were identified: leadership, interprofessional relationships, job fit and practice environment. In addition, the ideas of feeling valued, respected and acknowledged were woven throughout. Conclusions Factors often associated with nurse attrition such as burnout and job stresses were not emphasised by the respondents in our study as critical to their intent to stay in their area of practice. This study has highlighted positive aspects that motivate nurses to stay in their specialty areas. Relevance to clinical practice To ensure quality care for patients, retention of experienced emergency and critical care nurses is essential to maintaining specialty expertise in these practice settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Van Osch & Kathy Scarborough & Sarah Crowe & Angela C. Wolff & Sheryl Reimer‐Kirkham, 2018. "Understanding the factors which promote registered nurses’ intent to stay in emergency and critical care areas," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1209-1215, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:1209-1215
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14167
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dana Hayward & Vicky Bungay & Angela C Wolff & Valerie MacDonald, 2016. "A qualitative study of experienced nurses' voluntary turnover: learning from their perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1336-1345, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chuchai Smithikrai* & Thanatchaphorn Phetkham, 2019. "How Leader-Follower Relations Influence Nurses’ Intention to Stay: An Investigation in a Thai Sample," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(1), pages 183-189, 01-2019.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oumou Salama Daouda & Mounia N Hocine & Laura Temime, 2021. "Determinants of healthcare worker turnover in intensive care units: A micro-macro multilevel analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Sastrawan Sastrawan & Jennifer Margaret Newton & Gulzar Malik, 2019. "Nurses’ integrity and coping strategies: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 733-744, March.
    3. Jeonghee Hong & Misoon Kim & Eunyoung E. Suh & Sangwoon Cho & Soyoung Jang, 2021. "Comparison of Fatigue, Quality of Life, Turnover Intention, and Safety Incident Frequency between 2-Shift and 3-Shift Korean Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Jeong Hye Park & Min Jung Park & Hye Young Hwang, 2019. "Intention to leave among staff nurses in small‐ and medium‐sized hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1856-1867, May.
    5. Xiaorong Luan & Ping Wang & Wenxiu Hou & Lili Chen & Fenglan Lou, 2017. "Job stress and burnout: A comparative study of senior and head nurses in China," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 163-169, June.
    6. Yi-Chuan Chen & Yue-Liang Leon Guo & Wei-Shan Chin & Nai-Yun Cheng & Jiune-Jye Ho & Judith Shu-Chu Shiao, 2019. "Patient–Nurse Ratio is Related to Nurses’ Intention to Leave Their Job through Mediating Factors of Burnout and Job Dissatisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Ya‐Ting Ke & Joel F. Stocker, 2019. "On the difficulty of finding one’s place: A qualitative study of new nurses’ processes of growth in the workplace," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4321-4331, December.
    8. Jison Ki & Jaegeum Ryu & Jihyun Baek & Iksoo Huh & Smi Choi-Kwon, 2020. "Association between Health Problems and Turnover Intention in Shift Work Nurses: Health Problem Clustering," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-12, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:1209-1215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.