IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i23-24p4302-4310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resources for work‐related well‐being: A qualitative study about healthcare employees’ experiences of relationships at work

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie Schön Persson
  • Petra Nilsson Lindström
  • Pär Pettersson
  • Marie Nilsson
  • Kerstin Blomqvist

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore municipal healthcare employees’ experiences of relationships with care recipients and colleagues. The specific research questions were when do the relationships enhance well‐being, and what prerequisites are needed for such relationships to occur? Background Employees in health and social care for older people often depict their work in negative terms, and they often take a high number of sick leaves. Despite the heavy workload, other employees express well‐being at work and highlight social relationships as one reason for this. However, a greater understanding of how these relationships can act as resources for workplace well‐being is needed. Design The design of the study was qualitative and exploratory. Methods Qualitative interview studies were conducted with 23 healthcare employees in municipal health care. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results Two themes were identified as resources for promoting relationships between employees and care recipients or colleagues: (a) Being personal—a close interpersonal relationship to a care recipient—and (b) Colleague belongingness—a sense of togetherness within the working group. Spending quality time together, providing long‐term care and providing additional care were prerequisites for a close interpersonal relationship with care recipients. Trust, mutual responsibility and cooperation were prerequisites for a sense of togetherness within the working group. Conclusions The findings provide an empirical base to raise awareness of relationships with care recipients and colleagues as health aspects. Relationships among employees in health care are vital resources that must be considered to create sustainable workplaces and consequently improve the quality of care. Relevance to clinical practice The results of this study advocate health promotion efforts based on interpersonal relationships at the workplace. Dialogues in the working groups, based on the employees’ experiences of positive daily situations, may be a promoting method for the work‐related well‐being of the employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Schön Persson & Petra Nilsson Lindström & Pär Pettersson & Marie Nilsson & Kerstin Blomqvist, 2018. "Resources for work‐related well‐being: A qualitative study about healthcare employees’ experiences of relationships at work," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(23-24), pages 4302-4310, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:23-24:p:4302-4310
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14543
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mojtaba Vaismoradi & Hannele Turunen & Terese Bondas, 2013. "Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 398-405, September.
    2. Yvonne ten Hoeve & Saskia Kunnen & Jasperina Brouwer & Petrie F Roodbol, 2018. "The voice of nurses: Novice nurses’ first experiences in a clinical setting. A longitudinal diary study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1612-1626, April.
    3. Kihye Han & Alison M Trinkoff & Ayse P Gurses, 2015. "Work‐related factors, job satisfaction and intent to leave the current job among United States nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3224-3232, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel Songsore & Michael Buzzelli, 2016. "Ontario’s Experience of Wind Energy Development as Seen through the Lens of Human Health and Environmental Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Ana Cristina Lindsay & Sherrie F. Wallington & Faith D. Lees & Mary L. Greaney, 2018. "Exploring How the Home Environment Influences Eating and Physical Activity Habits of Low-Income, Latino Children of Predominantly Immigrant Families: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, May.
    3. Borch, Kristian & Munk, Anders K. & Dahlgaard, Vibeke, 2020. "Mapping wind-power controversies on social media: Facebook as a powerful mobilizer of local resistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Caro Wolfner & Corilyn Ott & Kalani Upshaw & Angela Stowe & Lisa Schwiebert & Robin Gaines Lanzi, 2023. "Coping Strategies and Help-Seeking Behaviors of College Students and Postdoctoral Fellows with Disabilities or Pre-Existing Conditions during COVID-19," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Christopher Mulwanda & Vincent R. Nyirenda & Ngawo Namukonde, 2024. "Traditional ecological knowledge, perceptions and practices on insect pollinator conservation: A case of the smallholder farmers in Murundu ward of Mufulira mining district of Zambia," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 24-35, March.
    6. Rebecca A. Johnson & David L. Albright & James R. Marzolf & Jessica L. Bibbo & Hayley D. Yaglom & Sandra M. Crowder & Gretchen M. Carlisle & Karen Grindler & Nathan Harms & Amy Willard & Marita Wassma, 2021. "Experiences of Military Veterans in a Therapeutic Horseback Riding Program," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(7), pages 923-933, September.
    7. Oliver Laasch & Dirk C. Moosmayer & Frithjof Arp, 2020. "Responsible Practices in the Wild: An Actor-Network Perspective on Mobile Apps in Learning as Translation(s)," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 253-277, January.
    8. Grazia Salvo & Bonnie M. Lashewicz & Patricia K. Doyle-Baker & Gavin R. McCormack, 2018. "Neighbourhood Built Environment Influences on Physical Activity among Adults: A Systematized Review of Qualitative Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Chilombo, Andrew & Van Der Horst, Dan, 2021. "Livelihoods and coping strategies of local communities on previous customary land in limbo of commercial agricultural development: Lessons from the farm block program in Zambia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    10. Sandra Carrasco & David O’Brien, 2023. "Build Back Safely: Evaluating the Occupational Health and Safety in Post-Disaster Reconstruction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Borja García-Lorenzo & Ania Gorostiza & Nerea González & Igor Larrañaga & Maider Mateo-Abad & Ana Ortega-Gil & Janika Bloemeke & Oliver Groene & Itziar Vergara & Javier Mar & Sarah N. Lim Choi Keung &, 2023. "Assessment of the Effectiveness, Socio-Economic Impact and Implementation of a Digital Solution for Patients with Advanced Chronic Diseases: The ADLIFE Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Diego De Leo & Benedetta Congregalli & Annalisa Guarino & Josephine Zammarrelli & Anna Valle & Stefano Paoloni & Sabrina Cipolletta, 2022. "Communicating Unexpected and Violent Death: The Experiences of Police Officers and Health Care Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Alvisa Palese & Erica Visintini & Valentina Bressan & Federico Fonda & Stefania Chiappinotto & Luca Grassetti & Maddalena Peghin & Carlo Tascini & Matteo Balestrieri & Marco Colizzi, 2023. "Using Metaphors to Understand Suffering in COVID-19 Survivors: A Two Time-Point Observational Follow-Up Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.
    14. Ahtisham Younas & Subia P. Rasheed & Amara Sundus & Shahzad Inayat, 2020. "Nurses' perspectives of self‐awareness in nursing practice: A descriptive qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 398-405, June.
    15. Emily Williams & Natisha Sands & Stephen Elsom & Roshani Kanchana Prematunga, 2015. "Mental health consumers' perceptions of quality of life and mental health care," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 299-306, September.
    16. Yasser Yahya Al-Ashmori & Idris Othman & Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous, 2022. "“Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Broqvist, Mari & Sandman, Lars & Garpenby, Peter & Krevers, Barbro, 2018. "The meaning of severity – do citizenś views correspond to a severity framework based on ethical principles for priority setting?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(6), pages 630-637.
    18. Maša Filipovič Hrast & Richard Sendi & Boštjan Kerbler, 2023. "Person–Environment Fit in Urban Neighbourhoods in Slovenia: Challenges and Coping Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Ahmed, Charisse V. & Weissinger, Guy & Teitelman, Anne & Sabelo Dlamini, Ndumiso & Patience Dlamini, Nontsikelelo & Cebsile Dlamini, Thuthukile & Nkambule, Angel & Nkambule, Siphesihle & Brawner, Brid, 2022. "Expert client service delivery practices among adolescents living with HIV in Eswatini: A thematic analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    20. Anna GW Nolte & Charlene Downing & Annie Temane & Marie Hastings‐Tolsma, 2017. "Compassion fatigue in nurses: A metasynthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4364-4378, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:23-24:p:4302-4310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.