IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i23-24p4239-4241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making best use of patient experience

Author

Listed:
  • Miles Sibley
  • Ray Earwicker
  • Jörg W. Huber

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Miles Sibley & Ray Earwicker & Jörg W. Huber, 2018. "Making best use of patient experience," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(23-24), pages 4239-4241, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:23-24:p:4239-4241
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14504
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheard, Laura & Marsh, Claire & O'Hara, Jane & Armitage, Gerry & Wright, John & Lawton, Rebecca, 2017. "The Patient Feedback Response Framework – Understanding why UK hospital staff find it difficult to make improvements based on patient feedback: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 19-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miia Marika Jansson & Marja Harjumaa & Ari‐Pekka Puhto & Minna Pikkarainen, 2020. "Patients’ satisfaction and experiences during elective primary fast‐track total hip and knee arthroplasty journey: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 567-582, February.
    2. Kuijper, Syb & Felder, Martijn & Clegg, Stewart & Bal, Roland & Wallenburg, Iris, 2024. "“We don't experiment with our patients!” An ethnographic account of the epistemic politics of (re)designing nursing work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    3. Joy Davis & Sue Sinni & Stephen Maloney & Lorraine Walker, 2022. "Strategies Australian Hospitals Utilize to Incorporate Patient Feedback in the Delivery and Measurement of Person-Centered Care: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(5), pages 782-794, June.
    4. Aavash Raj Pandey & Mahdi Seify & Udoka Okonta & Amin Hosseinian-Far, 2023. "Advanced Sentiment Analysis for Managing and Improving Patient Experience: Application for General Practitioner (GP) Classification in Northamptonshire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-11, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:23-24:p:4239-4241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.