Nature and scope of certified nurse‐midwifery practice: A workforce study

Aims and Objectives To describe the nature and scope of nurse‐midwifery practice in Texas and to determine legislative priorities and practice barriers. Background Across the globe, midwives are the largest group of maternity care providers despite little known about midwifery practice. With a looming shortage of midwives, there is a pressing need to understand midwives’ work environment and scope of practice. Design Mixed methods research utilising prospective descriptive survey and interview. Methods An online survey was administered to nurse‐midwives practicing in the state of Texas (N = 449) with a subset (n = 10) telephone interviewed. Descriptive and inferential statistics and content analysis was performed. Results The survey was completed by 141 midwives with eight interviewed. Most were older, Caucasian and held a master's degree. A majority worked full‐time, were in clinical practice in larger urban areas and were employed by a hospital or physician group. Care was most commonly provided for Hispanic and White women; approximately a quarter could care for greater numbers of patients. Most did not clinically teach midwifery students. Physician practice agreements were believed unnecessary and prescriptive authority requirements restrictive. Legislative issues were typically followed through the professional organisation or social media sites; most felt a lack of competence to influence health policy decisions. While most were satisfied with current clinical practice, a majority planned a change in the next 3 to 5 years. Conclusions An ageing midwifery workforce, not representative of the race/ethnicity of the populations served, is underutilised with practice requirements that limit provision of services. Health policy changes are needed to ensure unrestricted practice. Relevance to clinical practice Robust midwifery workforce data are needed as well as a midwifery board which tracks availability and accessibility of midwives. Educators should consider training models promoting long‐term service in underserved areas, and development of skills crucial for impacting health policy change.