IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i9-10p1428-1437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerability in patients and nurses and the mutual vulnerability in the patient–nurse relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Sanne Angel
  • Solfrid Vatne

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the mutual vulnerability of patients and nurses, anticipating that an enhanced understanding of the phenomenon may help reduce vulnerability. Background Patient vulnerability is a key issue in nursing, aimed at protecting the patient from harm. In the literature, vulnerability is described both from a risk perspective and a subjective perspective. This implies that the objective dimension of patient vulnerability does not necessarily reflect the patient's own perception of being vulnerable. However, external judgment may influence internal perception. Adding to this complexity, attention has also been drawn to the vulnerability of the nurse. Design A definition deduced from central literature on vulnerability captures the complexity of objective versus subjective vulnerability. Based on the perspective of vulnerability in general, vulnerability in healthcare services shows how dependency may increase patient vulnerability. Further, despite education, training and supportive settings, patients may increase nurse vulnerability. The core of this mutuality is explored in the light of Martin Heidegger's philosophy of being. Conclusion The patient's need for help from the nurse opens the patient to engage in supportive and/or harmful encounters. Thus, dependency adds to the vulnerability related to health issues. The nurse's vulnerability lies in her engagement in caring for the patient. If failing to provide proper care, the nurse's existence as ‘a good nurse’ is threatened. This is exacerbated if the patient turns against the nurse. Therefore, the core of vulnerability seems to lie in the fact that the patient and the nurse are both striving to be the persons they want to be, and the persons they have not yet become. Relevance to clinical practice Recognition of the mutual vulnerability in the patient–nurse relationship calls for collective acknowledgement of the demanding nature of caring relationships, for support and for a strengthening of professional skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanne Angel & Solfrid Vatne, 2017. "Vulnerability in patients and nurses and the mutual vulnerability in the patient–nurse relationship," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1428-1437, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:9-10:p:1428-1437
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13583
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13583?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. anonymous, 2006. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 200-201, 03-04.
    2. Oecd, 2006. "The Process of Regulatory Authorisation: A Report," OECD Papers, OECD Publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 1-84.
    3. anonymous, 2006. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 392-394, 07-08.
    4. Parle, Michael & Maguire, Peter & Heaven, Cathy, 1997. "The development of a training model to improve health professionals' skills, self-efficacy and outcome expectancies when communicating with cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 231-240, January.
    5. anonymous, 2006. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 547-550, September.
    6. Bente Martinsen & Annelise Norlyk, 2012. "Observations of assisted feeding among people with language impairment," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(19pt20), pages 2949-2957, October.
    7. anonymous, 2006. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 106-107, 01-02.
    8. anonymous, 2006. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 760-765, 11-12.
    9. -, 2006. "Volume 27 Author Listing," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 199-204.
    10. anonymous, 2006. "Focus on Authors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 291-292, 05-06.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Habran, Yves & Küpers, Wendelin & Weber, Jean-Christophe, 2024. "Reconceiving vulnerabilities in relations of care how to account for and deal with carers’ vulnerabilities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    2. Jenny Song & Christine McDonald, 2021. "Experiences of New Zealand registered nurses of Chinese ethnicity during the COVID‐19 pandemic," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 757-764, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghina Yamout & Dima Jamali, 2007. "A critical assessment of a proposed public private partnership (PPP) for the management of water services in Lebanon," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(3), pages 611-634, March.
    2. Janne Weis & Vibeke Zoffmann & Ingrid Egerod, 2014. "Improved nurse–parent communication in neonatal intensive care unit: evaluation and adjustment of an implementation strategy," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3478-3489, December.
    3. Breuer, Wolfgang & Hauten, Guido & Kreuz, Claudia, 2009. "Financial instruments with sports betting components: Marketing gimmick or a domain for behavioral finance?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(12), pages 2241-2252, December.
    4. Zhigeng Geng & Sijian Wang & Menggang Yu & Patrick O. Monahan & Victoria Champion & Grace Wahba, 2015. "Group variable selection via convex log-exp-sum penalty with application to a breast cancer survivor study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 53-62, March.
    5. Linh Thao Ly & Stefanie Rinderle-Ma & Kevin Göser & Peter Dadam, 2012. "On enabling integrated process compliance with semantic constraints in process management systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 195-219, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:9-10:p:1428-1437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.