IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oec/packaa/5l9hqdhkn4f1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Process of Regulatory Authorisation: A Report

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

Governments and/or regulatory authorities are responsible for, among other things, the definition of regulatory controls or conditions, if any, that should be applied to radioactive sources or radiation exposure situations in order to appropriately protect the public, workers and the environment. Countries use different policy and structural approaches to fulfil this responsibility. Generally, the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) are used as at least part of the basis for protection. Now, with the evolution of recommendations from the ICRP, a single, conceptually simple, and self-coherent approach can be used by governments and regulatory authorities to define appropriate protection under all circumstances. This report describes this process.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2006. "The Process of Regulatory Authorisation: A Report," OECD Papers, OECD Publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 1-84.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:packaa:5l9hqdhkn4f1
    DOI: 10.1787/oecd_papers-v6-art17-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/oecd_papers-v6-art17-en
    Download Restriction: Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/oecd_papers-v6-art17-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linh Thao Ly & Stefanie Rinderle-Ma & Kevin Göser & Peter Dadam, 2012. "On enabling integrated process compliance with semantic constraints in process management systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 195-219, April.
    2. Sanne Angel & Solfrid Vatne, 2017. "Vulnerability in patients and nurses and the mutual vulnerability in the patient–nurse relationship," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1428-1437, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:packaa:5l9hqdhkn4f1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oecddfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.