IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i13-14p1969-1977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasons for family involvement in elective surgical decision‐making in Taiwan: a qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Mei‐Ling Lin
  • Chuen‐Teng Huang
  • Ching‐Huey Chen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To inquire into the reasons for family involvement in adult patients’ surgical decision‐making processes from the point of view of the patients’ family. Background Making a patient the centre of medical decision‐making is essential for respecting individual's autonomy. However, in a Chinese society, family members are often deeply involved in a patient's medical decision‐making. Although family involvement has long been viewed as an aspect of the Chinese culture, empirical evidence of the reasons for family involvement in medical decision‐making has been lacking. Design A qualitative study. Method In order to record and examine reasons for family involvement in adult patients’ surgical decision‐making, 12 different family members of 12 elective surgery patients were interviewed for collecting and analysing data. Results Three major reasons for family involvement emerged from the data analyses: (1) to share responsibility; (2) to ensure the correctness of medical information; and (3) to safeguard the patient's well‐being. These findings also reveal that culture is not the only reason for family involvement. Conclusions Making decision to undergo a surgery is a tough and stressful process for a patient. Family may provide the patient with timely psychological support to assist the patient to communicate with his or her physician(s) and other medical personnel to ensure their rights. It is also found that due to the imbalanced doctor–patient power relationship, a patient may be unable, unwilling to, or even dare not, tell the whole truth about his or her illness or feelings to the medical personnel. Thus, a patient would expect his or her family to undertake such a mission during the informed consent and decision‐making processes. Relevance to clinical practice The results of this study may provide medical professionals with relevant insights into family involvement in adult patients’ surgical decision‐making.

Suggested Citation

  • Mei‐Ling Lin & Chuen‐Teng Huang & Ching‐Huey Chen, 2017. "Reasons for family involvement in elective surgical decision‐making in Taiwan: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1969-1977, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1969-1977
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13600
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zenobia Chan & Carmen Kan & Patrick Lee & Isabel Chan & Joyce Lam, 2012. "A systematic review of qualitative studies: patients’ experiences of preoperative communication," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5‐6), pages 812-824, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernice Redley & Lesego M. Phiri & Tanya Heyns & Wei Wang & Chin‐Yen Han, 2019. "Family needs during critical illness in the Emergency Department: A retrospective factor analysis of data from three countries," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2813-2823, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katja Schubert Samuelsson & Monika Egenvall & Inga Klarin & Johan Lökk & Ulf Gunnarsson & Marie Iwarzon, 2018. "The older patient's experience of the healthcare chain and information when undergoing colorectal cancer surgery according to the enhanced recovery after surgery concept," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1580-1588, April.
    2. Natalie Williams & Georgia Griffin & Victoria Farrell & Yvonne L. Hauck, 2020. "Gaining insight into the supportive care needs of women experiencing gynaecological cancer: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1684-1694, May.
    3. Tonje Sibbern & Vibeke Bull Sellevold & Simen A Steindal & Craig Dale & Judy Watt‐Watson & Alfhild Dihle, 2017. "Patients’ experiences of enhanced recovery after surgery: a systematic review of qualitative studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1172-1188, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:13-14:p:1969-1977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.