IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i15-16p2813-2823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family needs during critical illness in the Emergency Department: A retrospective factor analysis of data from three countries

Author

Listed:
  • Bernice Redley
  • Lesego M. Phiri
  • Tanya Heyns
  • Wei Wang
  • Chin‐Yen Han

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine underlying factor structure of the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory—Emergency Department across three countries to identify similarities and differences. Background Understanding family needs assists nurses to provide family‐centred care to deliver optimal outcomes for critically ill patients and their families in Emergency Departments. Design Retrospective secondary analyses of data collected in three cross‐sectional surveys. Methods Convenience samples involved recruitment of family members accompanying a critically ill relative into four Emergency Departments in Australia (2), South Africa (1) and Taiwan (1). Item‐matched raw data from 374 responses to 40 items from the surveys were collated and analysed using confirmatory factor analysis methods. Reporting adhered to an adapted STROBE checklist. Results The factor structure of the 40‐item Critical Care Family Needs Inventory—Emergency Department differed between countries. Analyses of the Australian data revealed a four‐factor solution comprised of 18 items across four categories of family need (support, communication, participation and comfort); the Taiwanese data also demonstrated a four‐factor solution comprised of 13 items (support, communication, participation and comfort); alternatively, the South African data revealed a two‐factor solution comprised of nine items (communication and participation). Fifteen items did not match across the countries. However, loading for four items common across all three countries was related to family participation (3) and communication (1). Conclusions The findings suggest family members from different countries responded to Critical Care Family Needs Inventory—Emergency Department items in different ways. Consistent with concepts of family‐centred care, the study identified participation and communication needs that were common across the countries. The outcomes illustrate the challenge of providing appropriate care for family members during critical illness of a relative in the ED. Relevance to clinical practice Family perceptions of important needs during critical illness in the Emergency Department differ across countries; hence, the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory—Emergency Department has limited utility. Participation and communication needs emerged as common family needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernice Redley & Lesego M. Phiri & Tanya Heyns & Wei Wang & Chin‐Yen Han, 2019. "Family needs during critical illness in the Emergency Department: A retrospective factor analysis of data from three countries," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2813-2823, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:2813-2823
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14857
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mei‐Ling Lin & Chuen‐Teng Huang & Ching‐Huey Chen, 2017. "Reasons for family involvement in elective surgical decision‐making in Taiwan: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1969-1977, July.
    2. Abbas Saleh Al‐Mutair & Virginia Plummer & Anthony O'Brien & Rosemary Clerehan, 2013. "Family needs and involvement in the intensive care unit: a literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(13-14), pages 1805-1817, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hege S Haugdahl & Regina Eide & Ingeborg Alexandersen & Tove Engan Paulsby & Berit Stjern & Stine Borgen Lund & Gørill Haugan, 2018. "From breaking point to breakthrough during the ICU stay: A qualitative study of family members’ experiences of long‐term intensive care patients’ pathways towards survival," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3630-3640, October.
    2. Anita Catlin & Marilee Ford & Carrie Maloney, 2016. "Determining Family Needs on an Oncology Hospital Unit Using Interview, Art, and Survey," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 25(2), pages 209-231, April.
    3. Ella Ottrey & Claire Palermo & Catherine E. Huggins & Judi Porter, 2018. "Exploring staff perceptions and experiences of volunteers and visitors on the hospital ward at mealtimes using an ethnographic approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1571-1579, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:2813-2823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.