IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i11-12p1737-1747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concept analysis of safety climate in healthcare providers

Author

Listed:
  • Ying‐Siou Lin
  • Yen‐Chun Lin
  • Meei‐Fang Lou

Abstract

Aim and objective To report an analysis of the concept of safety climate in healthcare providers. Background Compliance with safe work practices is essential to patient safety and care outcomes. Analysing the concept of safety climate from the perspective of healthcare providers could improve understanding of the correlations between safety climate and healthcare provider compliance with safe work practices, thus enhancing quality of patient care. Design Concept analysis. Data sources The electronic databases of CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed and Web of Science were searched for literature published between 1995–2015. Searches used the keywords ‘safety climate’ or ‘safety culture’ with ‘hospital’ or ‘healthcare’. Method The concept analysis method of Walker and Avant analysed safety climate from the perspective of healthcare providers. Results Three attributes defined how healthcare providers define safety climate: (1) creation of safe working environment by senior management in healthcare organisations; (2) shared perception of healthcare providers about safety of their work environment; and (3) the effective dissemination of safety information. Antecedents included the characteristics of healthcare providers and healthcare organisations as a whole, and the types of work in which they are engaged. Consequences consisted of safety performance and safety outcomes. Most studies developed and assessed the survey tools of safety climate or safety culture, with a minority consisting of interventional measures for improving safety climate. Conclusion More prospective studies are needed to create interventional measures for improving safety climate of healthcare providers. This study is provided as a reference for use in developing multidimensional safety climate assessment tools and interventional measures. Relevance to clinical practice The values healthcare teams emphasise with regard to safety can serve to improve safety performance. Having an understanding of the concept of and interventional measures for safety climate allows healthcare providers to ensure the safety of their operations and their patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying‐Siou Lin & Yen‐Chun Lin & Meei‐Fang Lou, 2017. "Concept analysis of safety climate in healthcare providers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(11-12), pages 1737-1747, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:11-12:p:1737-1747
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13641
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13641?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marília Duarte Valim & Maria H Palucci Marziale & Miguel Richart‐Martínez & Ángela Sanjuan‐Quiles, 2014. "Instruments for evaluating compliance with infection control practices and factors that affect it: an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(11-12), pages 1502-1519, June.
    2. Karlene H. Roberts, 1990. "Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 160-176, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mario Fargnoli & Mara Lombardi, 2020. "NOSACQ-50 for Safety Climate Assessment in Agricultural Activities: A Case Study in Central Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Paola Adinolfi & Carmela Annarumma & Gaetano Matonti & Rocco Palumbo & Gabriella Piscopo, 2017. "I costi della sicurezza e della non sicurezza in sanit?: un?analisi esplorativa," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(103), pages 9-30.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    2. Charles Sabel & Gary Herrigel & Peer Hull Kristensen, 2018. "Regulation under uncertainty: The coevolution of industry and regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 371-394, September.
    3. Daniel Nunan & Marialaura Di Domenico, 2017. "Big Data: A Normal Accident Waiting to Happen?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 481-491, October.
    4. Zhiang (John) Lin & Xia Zhao & Kiran M. Ismail & Kathleen M. Carley, 2006. "Organizational Design and Restructuring in Response to Crises: Lessons from Computational Modeling and Real-World Cases," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(5), pages 598-618, October.
    5. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Daniel Lunn, 2021. "Regression to the tail: Why the Olympics blow up," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 233-260, March.
    6. Vincent Giolito, 2015. "Managing organizational errors: Three theoretical lenses on a bank collapse," Working Papers CEB 15-033, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. J. S. Busby & A. M. Collins, 2014. "Organizational Sensemaking About Risk Controls: The Case of Offshore Hydrocarbons Production," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(9), pages 1738-1752, September.
    8. Bucher, Silke & Jäger, Urs P. & Cardoza, Guillermo, 2016. "FUNDES: Becoming a strategically mindful nonprofit," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4489-4498.
    9. Alfred A. Marcus & Mary L. Nichols, 1999. "On the Edge: Heeding the Warnings of Unusual Events," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 482-499, August.
    10. Foreman, Veronica L. & Favaró, Francesca M. & Saleh, Joseph H. & Johnson, Christopher W., 2015. "Software in military aviation and drone mishaps: Analysis and recommendations for the investigation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 101-111.
    11. Italo Masiello & Romain Herault & Martin Mansfeld & Maria Skogqvist, 2022. "Simulation-Based VR Training for the Nuclear Sector—A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Geoffrey Leuridan, 2020. "Bridging the gap between culture and safety in a critical care context: The role of work debate spaces," Post-Print hal-03577454, HAL.
    13. Karl E. Weick, 2010. "Reflections on Enacted Sensemaking in the Bhopal Disaster," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 537-550, May.
    14. M. Laura Frigotto & Marco Zamarian, 2013. "Resilience and specialization in volatile environments:evidence from the Italian Air Force Tornado crews learning practices," DEM Discussion Papers 2013/17, Department of Economics and Management.
    15. Benoît Journé, 2018. "How to Deal with the Contradictions of Safety Professional Development?," Post-Print hal-03753472, HAL.
    16. Ignacio J. Martinez-Moyano & David P. McCaffrey & Rogelio Oliva, 2014. "Drift and Adjustment in Organizational Rule Compliance: Explaining the “Regulatory Pendulum” in Financial Markets," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 321-338, April.
    17. Peter M. Madsen, 2009. "These Lives Will Not Be Lost in Vain: Organizational Learning from Disaster in U.S. Coal Mining," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 861-875, October.
    18. Bozeman, Barry, 2011. "The 2010 BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill: Implications for theory of organizational disaster," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 244-252.
    19. T. Anderson & J. S. Busby & M. Rouncefield, 2020. "Understanding the Ecological Validity of Relying Practice as a Basis for Risk Identification," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(7), pages 1383-1398, July.
    20. Léna Masson & Julienne Brabet, 2018. "The paradoxes of externalization strategy in a safety critical industry," Post-Print hal-01765294, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:11-12:p:1737-1747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.