IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i15-16p2285-2294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health transition after lung transplantation – a grounded theory study

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Lundmark
  • Lena‐Karin Erlandsson
  • Annette Lennerling
  • Matilda Almgren
  • Anna Forsberg

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate lung recipients' process of transition from prior the transplantation to one year afterwards, as well as what their main concerns are and how they deal with these concerns. Background During the last three decades, lung transplantation has been established as an effective treatment for patients with end‐stage pulmonary disease. Towards the end of the 20th century, the concept of survival expanded to also include improving health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). Although many studies have been published regarding lung recipients' HRQoL, aspects of health and everyday life remain understudied. Lung transplantation demands some kind of transition. However, very little is known about this transitional process. Design A qualitative inductive approach using Grounded Theory (GT) was used. Methods A total of ten adult males and five adult females (n = 15) with a mean age of 55 years were included in the study and interviewed one year after transplantation. The open‐ended interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim after each interview. The analysis of the material was performed consistent with Charmaz contructivistic approach of GT. Results The core category Reconstructing daily occupations summarises a process wherein the generated GT is present through four main categories: Restricting, Regaining, Reorganising and Enriching. The process of reconstructing daily occupations is necessary to regain health. Conclusions A trajectory of health transition is evident, starting pretransplant with the lung disease and severe illness and proceeding at least up to one year after the transplantation with experienced health. Relevance to clinical practice The result enables a unique possibility to enhance the lung recipients' striving for everyday life and thereby promote health. There is a need for change in the existing multidisciplinary transplant team to also include an occupational therapist to support and guide the lung recipients in changing their occupational patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Lundmark & Lena‐Karin Erlandsson & Annette Lennerling & Matilda Almgren & Anna Forsberg, 2016. "Health transition after lung transplantation – a grounded theory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2285-2294, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2285-2294
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13269
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13269?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dabbs, Annette De Vito & Hoffman, Leslie A. & Swigart, Valerie & Happ, Mary Beth & Dauber, James H. & McCurry, Kenneth R. & Iacono, Aldo, 2004. "Striving for normalcy: symptoms and the threat of rejection after lung transplantation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(7), pages 1473-1484, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matilda Almgren & Annette Lennerling & Martina Lundmark & Anna Forsberg, 2017. "Self‐efficacy in the context of heart transplantation – a new perspective," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3007-3017, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annina Seiler & Richard Klaghofer & Natalie Drabe & Chantal Martin-Soelch & Vera Hinderling-Baertschi & Lutz Goetzmann & Annette Boehler & Stefan Buechi & Josef Jenewein, 2016. "Patients’ Early Post-Operative Experiences with Lung Transplantation: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 9(6), pages 547-557, December.
    2. Jytte Graarup & Elin Lindberg Mogensen & Malene Missel & Selina Kikkenborg Berg, 2017. "Life after a lung transplant: a balance of joy and challenges," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3543-3552, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:15-16:p:2285-2294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.