IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v59y2004i7p1473-1484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Striving for normalcy: symptoms and the threat of rejection after lung transplantation

Author

Listed:
  • Dabbs, Annette De Vito
  • Hoffman, Leslie A.
  • Swigart, Valerie
  • Happ, Mary Beth
  • Dauber, James H.
  • McCurry, Kenneth R.
  • Iacono, Aldo

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe the psychosocial process of the symptom experience associated with the threat of organ rejection after lung transplantation. A grounded theory approach, including theoretical sampling and constant comparative analyses, was used in a sample of 14 lung transplant recipients who varied in age, gender, underlying lung disease, experience with rejection, and time since transplantation. 'Striving for normalcy' was the core process linking each of the four stages of the symptom experience and interpretation: naïveté, vulnerability, discovery, and insight. Each stage was marked by an initiating event, a predictable symptom response, and a dialectic (an internal struggle between recipients' personal perceptions of the situation and the juxtaposed understandings of the situation that they gleaned from transplant clinicians). Each stage was also labeled with a descriptor of the aspect of striving for normalcy that accounted for the variation in the symptom responses that recipients exhibited, the dialectics they faced, and the exemplars for each stage of the process. During the stage of naïveté, recipients were elated at improvements after transplantation, and often denied or delayed reporting symptoms. Once they experienced a rejection episode they entered the stage of vulnerability and became more vigilant about symptoms. The discovery stage was marked by the realization that rejection lacked characteristic symptoms; therefore, it was important to recognize any changes from their baseline condition. Recipients who achieved the insight stage realized that until they gave up some independence in exchange for interdependence, extended periods of normalcy eluded them, and embraced a reciprocal relationship with the transplant team. Knowledge that recipients' experience evolves over time from furtive hope during the stage of naïveté to qualified hope during the insight stage, directs us to intervene using stage-specific interventions to promote better symptom recognition and reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Dabbs, Annette De Vito & Hoffman, Leslie A. & Swigart, Valerie & Happ, Mary Beth & Dauber, James H. & McCurry, Kenneth R. & Iacono, Aldo, 2004. "Striving for normalcy: symptoms and the threat of rejection after lung transplantation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(7), pages 1473-1484, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:7:p:1473-1484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(04)00017-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martina Lundmark & Lena‐Karin Erlandsson & Annette Lennerling & Matilda Almgren & Anna Forsberg, 2016. "Health transition after lung transplantation – a grounded theory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2285-2294, August.
    2. Jytte Graarup & Elin Lindberg Mogensen & Malene Missel & Selina Kikkenborg Berg, 2017. "Life after a lung transplant: a balance of joy and challenges," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3543-3552, November.
    3. Annina Seiler & Richard Klaghofer & Natalie Drabe & Chantal Martin-Soelch & Vera Hinderling-Baertschi & Lutz Goetzmann & Annette Boehler & Stefan Buechi & Josef Jenewein, 2016. "Patients’ Early Post-Operative Experiences with Lung Transplantation: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 9(6), pages 547-557, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:7:p:1473-1484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.