IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i11-12p1757-1765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From expert generalists to ambiguity masters: using ambiguity tolerance theory to redefine the practice of rural nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Kaye Knight
  • Amanda Kenny
  • Ruth Endacott

Abstract

Aims and objectives To redefine the practice of rural nurses and describe a model that conceptualises the capabilities and characteristics required in the rural environment. Background The way in which the practice of rural nurses has been conceptualised is problematic. Definitions of rural nursing have been identified primarily through the functional context of rural health service delivery. The expert generalist term has provided a foundation theory for rural nurses with understandings informed by the scope of practice needed to meet service delivery requirements. However, authors exploring intrinsic characteristics of rural nurses have challenged this definition, as it does not adequately address the deeper, intangible complexities of practice required in the rural context. Despite this discourse, an alternative way to articulate the distinctive nature of rural nursing practice has eluded authors in Australia and internationally. Design A theoretical paper based on primary research. Methods The development of the model was informed by the findings of a study that explored the nursing practice of managing telephone presentations in rural health services in Victoria, Australia. The study involved policy review from State and Federal governments, nursing and medical professional bodies, and five rural health services; semi‐structured interviews with eight Directors of Nursing, seven registered nurses and focus group interviews with eight registered nurses. Results An ambiguity tolerance model drawn from corporate global entrepreneurship theory was adapted to explain the findings of the study. The adapted model presents capabilities and characteristics used by nurses to successfully manage the ambiguity of providing care in the rural context. Conclusions Redefining the practice of rural nurses, through an adapted theory of ambiguity tolerance, highlights nursing characteristics and capabilities required in the rural context. This perspective offers new ways of thinking about the work of rural nurses, rural nurse policy, education, recruitment, retention and clinical governance. Relevance to clinical practice A greater understanding of rural nurse practice will assist in achieving positive care outcomes in an environment with competing stakeholder needs, and limited resources and options for care.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaye Knight & Amanda Kenny & Ruth Endacott, 2016. "From expert generalists to ambiguity masters: using ambiguity tolerance theory to redefine the practice of rural nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(11-12), pages 1757-1765, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:11-12:p:1757-1765
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13196
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenny, Amanda & Duckett, Stephen, 2004. "A question of place: medical power in rural Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 1059-1073, March.
    2. Endres, Megan L & Chowdhury, Sanjib & Milner, Morgan, 2009. "Ambiguity tolerance and accurate assessment of self-efficacy in a complex decision task," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 31-46, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sahar Eghbali & Masoomeh Najafi, 2020. "Emergency Nurses Job Satisfaction Prediction Model: Personality traits, Resilience, Emotional Expression and Ambiguity Tolerance," Journal of Molecular Biology Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 1-37, December.
    2. Wranik, Wiesława Dominika & Gambold, Liesl & Peacock, Stuart, 2021. "Uncertainty tolerance among experts involved in drug reimbursement recommendations: Qualitative evidence from HTA committees in Canada and Poland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 307-319.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elise Sullivan & Karen Francis & Desley Hegney, 2010. "Triage, treat and transfer: reconceptualising a rural practice model," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1625-1634, June.
    2. Agnieszka Bem & Rafał Siedlecki & Paweł Prędkiewicz & Patrizia Gazzola & Bożena Ryszawska & Paulina Ucieklak-Jeż, 2019. "Hospitals’ Financial Health in Rural and Urban Areas in Poland: Does It Ensure Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Lin, Yen-Ju & Tian, Wei-Hua & Chen, Chun-Chih, 2011. "Urbanization and the utilization of outpatient services under National Health Insurance in Taiwan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 236-243.
    4. Lehoux, Pascale & Daudelin, Geneviève & Poland, Blake & Andrews, Gavin J. & Holmes, Dave, 2007. "Designing a better place for patients: Professional struggles surrounding satellite and mobile dialysis units," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 1536-1548, October.
    5. Yangyi Kwon & Jhong Yun (Joy) Kim & Andrew Keane, 2020. "The Structural Relationship among Career-Related Mentoring, Ambiguity Tolerance, and Job Search Effort and Behavior of Korean College Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Farmer, Jane & Currie, Margaret & Kenny, Amanda & Munoz, Sarah-Anne, 2015. "An exploration of the longer-term impacts of community participation in rural health services design," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 64-71.
    7. Amanda Kenny & Ann Allenby, 2013. "Barriers to nurses providing psychosocial care in the Australian rural context," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 194-200, June.
    8. Innocenti, Stefania & Cowan, Robin, 2019. "Self-efficacy beliefs and imitation: A two-armed bandit experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 156-172.
    9. Yi Xue & Zhonggen Yu, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Ambiguity Tolerance: Unearthing Its Role in Sustainable Language Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Kaye Knight & Amanda Kenny & Ruth Endacott, 2015. "Assessing clinical urgency via telephone in rural Australia," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 201-207, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:11-12:p:1757-1765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.