IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i13-14p1897-1907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User involvement in in‐patient mental health services: operationalisation, empirical testing, and validation

Author

Listed:
  • Marianne Storm
  • Kjell Hausken
  • Aslaug Mikkelsen

Abstract

Aims. This study presents development, empirical testing and validation of an instrument measuring service user involvement in in‐patient mental health from the mental health professionals’ perspective. Background. Service user involvement is high on the agenda in European mental health policies. In Norway, focus is on enhanced service user involvement at both the individual and organisational levels of in‐patient mental health services. Mental health professionals are in an important position to ensure opportunities for real user involvement in in‐patient mental health care. However, there is a need for more empirical knowledge on how mental health professionals attend to service user involvement. Design. Survey. Methods. A self‐report questionnaire was designed and administered to 121 mental health professionals, with 98 responses, working in a community‐based mental health centre in western Norway. Factor analysis procedures together with reliability testing were performed. Results. A 30‐items instrument was developed. The instrument contains four components/subscales: (1) Democratic patient involvement (mean score 3·74, Cronbach’s alpha 0·81), (2) Carer involvement (mean score 3·67, Cronbach’s alpha 0·82), (3) Assisted patient involvement (mean score 4·05, Cronbach’s alpha 0·78) and (4) Management support (mean score 4·10, Cronbach’s alpha 0·75). These subscales were found to be essential to service user involvement in the context of in‐patient mental health care. The total mean score for the instrument was 3·88, Cronbach’s alpha 0·88. Conclusion. Empirical testing of the instrument demonstrates that the measurement of mental health professionals’ perception of service user involvement has a reasonable level of construct validity and reliability. Relevance to clinical practice. We have developed a measurement instrument with items reflecting essential characteristics to user involvement in in‐patient mental health services. We believe that answering this questionnaire on the subject user involvement can act as one step towards enhancing awareness of this issue and to assess user‐oriented practices in treatment and services.

Suggested Citation

  • Marianne Storm & Kjell Hausken & Aslaug Mikkelsen, 2010. "User involvement in in‐patient mental health services: operationalisation, empirical testing, and validation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(13‐14), pages 1897-1907, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:13-14:p:1897-1907
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03036.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03036.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03036.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Ocasio, 1997. "Towards An Attention‐Based View Of The Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(S1), pages 187-206, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marianne Storm & Kjell Hausken & Knud Knudsen, 2011. "Inpatient service providers’ perspectives on service user involvement in Norwegian community mental health centres," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 57(6), pages 551-563, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Peter Grajzl & Stjepan Srhoj & Jaka Cepec & Barbara Mörec, 2024. "A by-product of big government: the attenuating role of public procurement for the effectiveness of grants-based entrepreneurship policy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 895-916, March.
    3. Dwibedy, Punyashlok, 2022. "Informal competition and product innovation decisions of new ventures and incumbents across developing and transitioning countries," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    4. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    6. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    7. Verrier, Brunilde & Strachan, Neil, 2024. "Sunset and sunrise business strategies shaping national energy transitions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    8. Zhiwei Yan & Xuerong Peng & Seoki Lee & Leibao Zhang, 2023. "How do multiple cognitions shape corporate proactive environmental strategies? The joint effects of environmental awareness and entrepreneurial orientation," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 1592-1617, September.
    9. Laura Lecluyse & Mirjam Knockaert & André Spithoven, 2019. "The contribution of science parks: a literature review and future research agenda," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 559-595, April.
    10. Guo, Bin, 2011. "The scope of external information-seeking under uncertainty: An individual-level study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 137-148.
    11. Abdullah J. Sultan, 2022. "Aligning employees’ work engagement and behavioral performance with internal branding: the missing link of employees’ perceived brand authenticity," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 52-64, March.
    12. Dan Huang & Jie Cheng & Xiaofeng Quan & Yanling Wu, 2024. "Managerial attention to environmental protection and corporate green innovation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1047-1081, October.
    13. Vasanthan Subramaniam & Shaista Wasiuzzaman, 2019. "Corporate diversification and dividend policy: empirical evidence from Malaysia," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 735-758, September.
    14. Jeremy Galbreath & Chia‐Yang Chang & Daniel Tisch, 2023. "The impact of a proactive environmental strategy on environmentally sustainable practices in service firms: The moderating effect of information use value," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5420-5434, December.
    15. Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2017. "Breadth of external knowledge sourcing and product innovation: The moderating role of strategic human resource practices," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 261-272.
    16. Xu, Kai & Hitt, Michael A. & Dai, Li, 2020. "International diversification of family-dominant firms: Integrating socioemotional wealth and behavioral theory of the firm," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(3).
    17. Alona Bilokha & Sudip Gupta, 2024. "Shareholder litigation rights and firm productivity," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 65-90, May.
    18. Ajay Agrawal & Christian Catalini & Avi Goldfarb & Hong Luo, 2018. "Slack Time and Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1056-1073, December.
    19. Feim M. Blakçori, 2014. "The Role of Formal Routines in Organizational Innovation," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(2), pages 56-70, February.
    20. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:13-14:p:1897-1907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.