IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i11-12p1664-1674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of unit‐level nurse practice environment and burnout on nurse‐reported outcomes: a multilevel modelling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Van Bogaert
  • Sean Clarke
  • Ella Roelant
  • Herman Meulemans
  • Paul Van de Heyning

Abstract

Aim. To investigate impacts of practice environment factors and burnout at the nursing unit level on job outcomes and nurse‐assessed quality of care in acute hospital nurses. Background. Prior research has consistently demonstrated correlations between nurse practice environments and nurses’ job satisfaction and health at work, but somewhat less evidence connects practice environments with patient outcomes. The relationship has also been more extensively documented using hospital‐wide measures of environments as opposed to measures at the nursing unit level. Design. Survey. Method. Data from a sample of 546 staff nurses from 42 units in four Belgian hospitals were analysed using a two‐level (nursing unit and nurse) random intercept model. Linear and generalised linear mixed effects models were fitted including nurse practice environment dimensions measured with the Revised Nursing Work Index and burnout dimensions of the Maslach Burnout Inventory as independent variables and job outcome and nurse‐assessed quality of care variables as dependent variables. Results. Significant unit‐level associations were found between nurse practice environment and burnout dimensions and job satisfaction, turnover intentions and nurse‐reported quality of care. Emotional exhaustion is a predictor of job satisfaction, nurse turnover intentions and assessed quality of care as well besides various nurse work practice environment dimensions. Nurses ‘ratings of unit‐level management and hospital‐level management and organisational support had effects in opposite directions on assessments of quality of care at the unit; this suggests that nurses’ perceptions of conditions on their nursing units relative to their perceptions of their institutions at large are potentially influential in their overall job experience. Conclusion. Nursing unit variation of the nurse practice environment and feelings of burnout predicts job outcome and nurse‐reported quality of care variables. Relevance to clinical practice. The team and environmental contexts of nursing practice play critical roles in the recruitment and retention of nurses, and as well as in the quality of care delivered. Widespread burnout as a nursing unit characteristic, reflecting a response to chronic organisational stressors, merits special attention from staff nurses, physicians, managers and leaders.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Van Bogaert & Sean Clarke & Ella Roelant & Herman Meulemans & Paul Van de Heyning, 2010. "Impacts of unit‐level nurse practice environment and burnout on nurse‐reported outcomes: a multilevel modelling approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1664-1674, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1664-1674
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03128.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03128.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03128.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Côté, Karine & Lauzier, Martin & Stinglhamber, Florence, 2021. "The relationship between presenteeism and job satisfaction: A mediated moderation model using work engagement and perceived organizational support," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 270-278.
    2. Peter Van Bogaert & Lieve Peremans & Nadine Diltour & Danny Van heusden & Tinne Dilles & Bart Van Rompaey & Donna Sullivan Havens, 2016. "Staff Nurses’ Perceptions and Experiences about Structural Empowerment: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Constanze Leineweber & Hugo Westerlund & Holendro Singh Chungkham & Rikard Lindqvist & Sara Runesdotter & Carol Tishelman, 2014. "Nurses' Practice Environment and Work-Family Conflict in Relation to Burn Out: A Multilevel Modelling Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-9, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1664-1674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.