IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v18y2006i8p1151-1165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'Epistemological dependency'-cognitive relativism in development thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Bianca Többe Gonçalves

    (Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Nowadays fashionable postmodernism entered the realm of development studies as post-development. Although post-development has been widely criticised on account of its political and economic romanticism, many critics nevertheless wrongly praise the methodological 'challenge' posed by post-developmentalism. It will be argued that postmodernism's cognitive relativism cannot be a serious approach to investigate development problems. A closer look at the epistemological divide within the social sciences (Hegelianism vs. positivism) helps to understand why postmodernism's cognition attracts even many of its critics and why universal reason needs to be defended. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianca Többe Gonçalves, 2006. "'Epistemological dependency'-cognitive relativism in development thinking," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(8), pages 1151-1165.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:18:y:2006:i:8:p:1151-1165
    DOI: 10.1002/jid.1299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/jid.1299
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jid.1299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andy Storey, 2000. "Post-Development Theory: Romanticism and Pontius Pilate politics," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 43(4), pages 40-46, December.
    2. Merquior, JoseGuilherme, 1993. "A panoramic view of the rebirth of liberalisms," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 1263-1269, August.
    3. Arturo Escobar, 2000. "Beyond the Search for a Paradigm? Post-Development and beyond," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 43(4), pages 11-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murat Arsel & Aram Ziai, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 833-854, July.
    2. Tanya Jakimow, 2008. "Answering the critics," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 8(4), pages 311-323, October.
    3. James Smith, 2005. "Context-bound knowledge production, capacity building and new product networks," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(5), pages 647-659.
    4. Amrita Chhachhi & Kevin P. Donovan, 2014. "‘Development’ as if We Have Never Been Modern: Fragments of a Latourian Development Studies," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(5), pages 869-894, September.
    5. Peter A. Kwaku Kyem, 2012. "Is ICT the panacea to sub-Saharan Africa’s development problems? Rethinking Africa’s contentious engagement with the global information society," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 12(2-3), pages 231-244, July.
    6. Matthias Schmelzer & Tonny Nowshin, 2023. "Ecological Reparations and Degrowth: Towards a Convergence of Alternatives Around World-making After Growth," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 66(1), pages 15-22, June.
    7. Pansera, Mario & Owen, Richard, 2015. "Framing resource-constrained innovation at the ‘bottom of the pyramid’: Insights from an ethnographic case study in rural Bangladesh," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 300-311.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:18:y:2006:i:8:p:1151-1165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.