IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/develp/v43y2000i4p40-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Development Theory: Romanticism and Pontius Pilate politics

Author

Listed:
  • Andy Storey

    (Development Studies Centre, Ireland)

Abstract

Andy Storey looks at post-development theory's challenge to dominant development paradigms. He offers a critique of the post-development critique and suggests that some of the insights of post-development theory can be of considerable value to those concerned with struggles for social change. Development (2000) 43, 40–46. doi:10.1057/palgrave.development.1110194

Suggested Citation

  • Andy Storey, 2000. "Post-Development Theory: Romanticism and Pontius Pilate politics," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 43(4), pages 40-46, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:develp:v:43:y:2000:i:4:p:40-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/development/journal/v43/n4/pdf/1110194a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/development/journal/v43/n4/full/1110194a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bianca Többe Gonçalves, 2006. "'Epistemological dependency'-cognitive relativism in development thinking," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(8), pages 1151-1165.
    2. Tanya Jakimow, 2008. "Answering the critics," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 8(4), pages 311-323, October.
    3. Murat Arsel & Aram Ziai, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 833-854, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:develp:v:43:y:2000:i:4:p:40-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.