IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v11y1999i4p535-546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development studies and policy studies: in the short run we are all dead

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond Apthorpe

    (NCDS, Australian National University, Australia)

Abstract

Development Studies has been dominated by a mainstream economics-based agenda that has failed to study and recognise the importance of social and political processes and patterns of poverty. Agencies and institutions within development and aid are beginning to acknowledge this deficiency, but in Africa and elsewhere poverty is still increasing and welfare decreasing. Changing from Development Studies to Poverty Studies offers an opportunity to incorporate ideas and methodologies from other disciplines into the social analysis of poverty, including the politics of patronage and decision-making in organizations with responsibility for issues where there are immediate implications for poverty and wealth. This article analyzes the alternative futures for Development Studies according to how far and how urgently its exponents are prepared to accept this change. The establishment of an African Tertiary educational facility for the social analysis of policy is proposed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond Apthorpe, 1999. "Development studies and policy studies: in the short run we are all dead," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(4), pages 535-546.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:11:y:1999:i:4:p:535-546
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199906)11:4<535::AID-JID603>3.0.CO;2-U
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lipton, Michael, 1997. "Editorial: Poverty -- are there holes in the consensus?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 1003-1007, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gasper, D.R., 2001. "Interdisciplinarity : building bridges, and nurturing a complex ecology of ideas," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19078, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. F. le R. Booysen, 2001. "Non‐Payment Of Services: A Problem Of Ability‐To‐Pay," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 69(4), pages 674-697, December.
    2. Donovan Storey & Hannah Bulloch & John Overton, 2005. "The poverty consensus: some limitations of the ‘popular agenda’," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 5(1), pages 30-44, January.
    3. Zack Zimbalist, 2017. "Breaking down rural and urban bias and interrogating spatial inequality, evidence from South Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 246-269, October.
    4. Rufus B. Akindola, 2009. "Towards a Definition of Poverty," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 25(2), pages 121-150, April.
    5. Howard White, 1998. "British aid and the White Paper on International Development: dressing a wolf in sheep's clothing in the emperor's new clothes?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(2), pages 151-166.
    6. Bruno Lautier, 2002. "Pourquoi faut-il aider les pauvres ? Une étude critique du discours de la Banque mondiale sur la pauvreté," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 43(169), pages 137-165.
    7. Sanjay K Mohanty & Golam Rasul & Bidhubhusan Mahapatra & Dhrupad Choudhury & Sabarnee Tuladhar & E. Valdemar Holmgren, 2018. "Multidimensional Poverty in Mountainous Regions: Shan and Chin in Myanmar," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 23-44, July.
    8. Hummera Saleem & Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Bilal Khan, 2021. "Re-examining Multidimensional Poverty in Pakistan: A New Assessment of Regional Variations," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(6), pages 1441-1458, December.
    9. Andrew Goudie & Paul Ladd, 1999. "Economic growth, poverty and inequality," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 177-195.
    10. Muhammad Shahbaz, 2010. "Income inequality‐economic growth and non‐linearity: a case of Pakistan," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(8), pages 613-636, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:11:y:1999:i:4:p:535-546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.