IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v10y1998i2p151-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

British aid and the White Paper on International Development: dressing a wolf in sheep's clothing in the emperor's new clothes?

Author

Listed:
  • Howard White

    (Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The Labour government's new White Paper promises great changes in the British aid programme: re-focusing aid on poverty reduction, partnerships replacing one-sided conditionalities, and policy coherence so that the broad gamut of British policies in areas as diverse as agriculture, trade and investment are in line with the needs of international development. However, the Paper is stronger on broad policy statements than detail as to how to implement these strategies. Moreover, an examination of the history of British aid shows continuity to have been greater than change. Both Labour and Conservative governments have presided over cuts in UK aid, and so instead pointed to the high quality of British aid. But efforts to improve aid quality have been impeded by the use of aid to achieve political and commercial objectives. Whether the White Paper represents a break with the past cannot be determined by the Paper's brave rhetoric, but only by the future actions of the Department for International Development. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Howard White, 1998. "British aid and the White Paper on International Development: dressing a wolf in sheep's clothing in the emperor's new clothes?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(2), pages 151-166.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:10:y:1998:i:2:p:151-166
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199803/04)10:2<151::AID-JID528>3.0.CO;2-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver Morrissey, 1998. "ATP is dead: long live mixed credits," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(2), pages 247-255.
    2. Alan Whaites, 1998. "The new UK White Paper on International Development: an NGO perspective," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(2), pages 203-213.
    3. Lynda Chalker, 1992. "Aid and poverty," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(1), pages 87-93, January.
    4. Howard White & Lois Woestman, 1994. "The Quality of Aid: Measuring Trends in Donor Performance," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 25(3), pages 527-554, July.
    5. Mary Sutton & Adrian Hewitt, 1982. "Taking Stock: Three Years of Conservative Aid Policy," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 0(1), pages 20-37, April.
    6. Jo Beall, 1998. "The gender and poverty nexus in the DFID White Paper: opportunity or constraint?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(2), pages 235-246.
    7. Tony Killick, 1997. "Principals, Agents And The Failings Of Conditionality," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 483-495.
    8. Lipton, Michael, 1997. "Editorial: Poverty -- are there holes in the consensus?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 1003-1007, July.
    9. Adrian Hewitt, 1978. "British Aid: Policy and Practice," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 0(2), pages 51-66, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark McGillivray, 2005. "What determines African bilateral aid receipts?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(8), pages 1003-1018.
    2. Oliveira Cruz, Valeria & McPake, Barbara, 2010. "The "aid contract" and its compensation scheme: A case study of the performance of the Ugandan health sector," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(7), pages 1357-1365, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. F. le R. Booysen, 2001. "Non‐Payment Of Services: A Problem Of Ability‐To‐Pay," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 69(4), pages 674-697, December.
    2. Howard White & Simon Feeny, 2003. "An Examination Of The Long-Run Trends And Recent Developments In Foreign Aid," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 28(1), pages 113-135, June.
    3. Arjan de Haan & Ward Warmerdam, 2012. "The politics of aid revisited: a review of evidence on state capacity and elite commitment," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-007-12, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    4. Leandro, Jose E. & Schafer, Hartwig & Frontini, Gaspar, 1999. "Towards A More Effective Conditionality: An Operational Framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 285-300, February.
    5. Lodewijk Smets & Stephen Knack & Nadia Molenaers, 2013. "Political ideology, quality at entry and the success of economic reform programs," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 447-476, December.
    6. Arellano, Cristina & Bulír, Ales & Lane, Timothy & Lipschitz, Leslie, 2009. "The dynamic implications of foreign aid and its variability," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 87-102, January.
    7. Ashok Chakravarti, 2012. "Institutions, Economic Performance and the Visible Hand," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14751.
    8. Arild Angelsen, 2017. "REDD+ as Result-based Aid: General Lessons and Bilateral Agreements of Norway," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 237-264, May.
    9. Omotunde E.G. JOHNSON, 2005. "Country Ownership Of Reform Programmes And The Implications For Conditionality," G-24 Discussion Papers 35, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    10. Arild Angelsen, 2013. "REDD+ as Performance-Based Aid: General Lessons and Bilateral Agreements of Norway," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-135, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Simović Dragana, 2015. "Project Management in Development Aid Industry – Public vs. Private," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 21(72), pages 167-197, February.
    12. Donovan Storey & Hannah Bulloch & John Overton, 2005. "The poverty consensus: some limitations of the ‘popular agenda’," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 5(1), pages 30-44, January.
    13. Knack, Stephen & Rogers, F. Halsey & Eubank, Nicholas, 2011. "Aid Quality and Donor Rankings," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 1907-1917.
    14. Hackenesch, Christine, 2015. "It’s Domestic Politics, Stupid! EU Democracy Promotion Strategies Meet African Dominant Party Regimes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 85-96.
    15. Zack Zimbalist, 2017. "Breaking down rural and urban bias and interrogating spatial inequality, evidence from South Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 246-269, October.
    16. Alessia Isopi & Fabrizio Mattesini, 2009. "Good Donors or Good Recipients? A Repeated Moral Hazard Model of Aid Allocation," Discussion Papers 09/10, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    17. Kletzer, Kenneth, 2005. "Aid and Sanctions," Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt5hq5d9gp, Department of Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
    18. Rufus B. Akindola, 2009. "Towards a Definition of Poverty," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 25(2), pages 121-150, April.
    19. Molenaers, Nadia & Dellepiane, Sebastian & Faust, Jorg, 2015. "Political Conditionality and Foreign Aid," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 2-12.
    20. Bruno Lautier, 2002. "Pourquoi faut-il aider les pauvres ? Une étude critique du discours de la Banque mondiale sur la pauvreté," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 43(169), pages 137-165.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:10:y:1998:i:2:p:151-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.