IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/prodev/v5y2005i1p30-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The poverty consensus: some limitations of the ‘popular agenda’

Author

Listed:
  • Donovan Storey

    (Institute of Development Studies, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand)

  • Hannah Bulloch

    (Australian National University, 0200 ACT, Australia)

  • John Overton

    (Institute of Development Studies, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand, j.d.overton@massey.ac.nz)

Abstract

The New Poverty Agenda is said to represent a break with the past and to offer a rationale for aid that is built on partnerships towards a common and realizable goal - the elimination of poverty. However, recent critiques have highlighted problems with the practice of poverty policy, and particularly limitations identified from its association with global actors which stand accused of contributing to poverty. For some, there is no new agenda; a poverty focus merely represents a different path to the same ends (i.e., political reform and economic adjustment). This paper investigates the implications for smaller donors, such as Australia and New Zealand, of adopting poverty policy as defined by the World Bank and others. It argues that certain contexts, such as the Pacific, demonstrate the weaknesses of an all-encompassing policy that remains muddled and contradictory. In terms of effective partnerships, much more could be gained by first seeking to learn more about the nature of poverty in the immediate region and its underlying causes.

Suggested Citation

  • Donovan Storey & Hannah Bulloch & John Overton, 2005. "The poverty consensus: some limitations of the ‘popular agenda’," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 5(1), pages 30-44, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:5:y:2005:i:1:p:30-44
    DOI: 10.1191/1464993405ps099oa
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1191/1464993405ps099oa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1191/1464993405ps099oa?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:devpol:v:21:y:2003:i:1:p:5-25 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Andrew Shepherd, 2001. "Consolidating the lessons of 50 years of 'development'," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 315-320.
    3. Craig, David & Porter, Doug, 2003. "Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: A New Convergence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 53-69, January.
    4. Simon Maxwell, 2001. "Innovative and important, yes, but also instrumental and incomplete: the treatment of redistribution in the new 'New Poverty Agenda'," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 331-341.
    5. Jan Nederveen Pieterse, 1998. "My Paradigm or Yours? Alternative Development, Post‐Development, Reflexive Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 29(2), pages 343-373, April.
    6. Lipton, Michael, 1997. "Editorial: Poverty -- are there holes in the consensus?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 1003-1007, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hickey, Sam, 2005. "The politics of staying poor: exploring the political space for poverty reduction in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 995-1009, June.
    2. Michael Hubbard, 2001. "Attacking Poverty-a strategic dilemma for the World Bank," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 293-298.
    3. Murat Arsel & Navé Wald, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 618-643, July.
    4. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.
    5. Murat Arsel & Aram Ziai, 2015. "Forum 2015," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(4), pages 833-854, July.
    6. Gordon Wilson, 2008. "Our knowledge ourselves: Engineers (re)thinking technology in development," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(6), pages 739-750.
    7. James Smith, 2005. "Context-bound knowledge production, capacity building and new product networks," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(5), pages 647-659.
    8. Martin Painter, 2005. "The Politics of State Sector Reforms in Vietnam: Contested Agendas and Uncertain Trajectories," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 261-283.
    9. Cristina Irina PARASCHIV, 2017. "The role of education in poverty alleviation," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special), pages 115-134.
    10. Madalina Viorica ION (MANU) & Ilie VASILE, 2017. "How much is the listed enterprise worth? The price multipliers’ approach," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special), pages 77-82.
    11. Gulrajani, Nilima, 2010. "Challenging global accountability: the intersection of contracts and culture in the World Bank," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 30045, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Cristina VLAD & Birol IBADULA & Claudiu IONIȚĂ & Petre BREZEANU, 2017. "The influence of VAT on prices and inflation rate. Romania case," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special), pages 106-114.
    13. Zack Zimbalist, 2017. "Breaking down rural and urban bias and interrogating spatial inequality, evidence from South Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 35, pages 246-269, October.
    14. Yaqi Du & Rong Zhao, 2023. "Early Warning of Poverty Returning against the Background of Rural Revitalization: A Case Study of Two Counties in Guangxi Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Tracy Smith‐Carrier & Andrea Lawlor & Sarah Benbow, 2019. "An “Opportunity” for Policy Recycling? A Critical Analysis of the Canadian Poverty Reduction Strategy," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 325-343, December.
    16. Diana Mitlin & University of Manchester & Sam Hickey & University of Manchester & Anthony Bebbington & University of Manchester, 2006. "Reclaiming development? NGOs and the challenge of alternatives," Economics Series Working Papers GPRG-WPS-043, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    17. Tatiana BOGDAN, 2017. "Financing medical services in Romania’s health system," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special), pages 7-16.
    18. Gephart, Malte, 2013. "Convergence, Divergence and a Complex Interplay: Chile and the International and Transnational Anti-Corruption Campaign," GIGA Working Papers 224, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    19. Kerstin Danert & Richard C. Carter & Ronnie Rwamwanja & Jamil Ssebalu & Graham Carr & David Kane, 2003. "The private sector in rural water and sanitation services in Uganda: understanding the context and developing support strategies," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(8), pages 1099-1114.
    20. Wiebe Nauta, 2010. "Saving Depraved Africans in a Neoliberal Age," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 26(3), pages 355-385, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:5:y:2005:i:1:p:30-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.