IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jforec/v44y2025i3p941-959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal Forecasting Rationality Among Expert Forecasters

Author

Listed:
  • Belen Chocobar
  • Peter Claeys
  • Marcos Poplawski‐Ribeiro

Abstract

Macroeconomic theories attribute rigidities in expectations formation to two mechanisms: sticky or noisy information. Recent advances in testing time variations in forecast dispersion—using the fluctuation rationality test—allow detecting departures from forecaster rationality over time. Relating individual forecaster behavior to economic or political factors on a panel of budget balance forecasts from Consensus Economics, a large panel of individual expert forecasters in four major OECD countries between 1993 to 2023, we find evidence for forecaster behavior in line with noisy information. Traditional full‐sample tests show that forecasters are not rational, but this is due to an overly pessimistic reaction to sudden big shifts, like the global financial crisis or the pandemic. In normal times, forecasters do systematically incorporate economic and political news in budget forecast revisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Belen Chocobar & Peter Claeys & Marcos Poplawski‐Ribeiro, 2025. "Fiscal Forecasting Rationality Among Expert Forecasters," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 941-959, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:44:y:2025:i:3:p:941-959
    DOI: 10.1002/for.3237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3237
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/for.3237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jforec:v:44:y:2025:i:3:p:941-959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/2966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.