IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/isacfm/v22y2015i2p115-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visualizing the Invisible Hand of Markets: Simulating Complex Dynamic Economic Interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Klaus Jaffé

Abstract

In complex systems, many different parts interact in nonobvious ways. Traditional research focuses on a few or a single aspect of the problem so as to analyse it with the tools available. To get a better insight of phenomena that emerge from complex interactions, we need instruments that can analyse simultaneously complex interactions between many parts. Here, a simulator modelling different types of economies is used to visualize complex quantitative aspects that affect economic dynamics. The main conclusions are: (1) relatively simple economic settings produce complex nonlinear dynamics and, therefore, linear regressions are often unsuitable to capture complex economic dynamics; (2) flexible pricing of goods by individual agents according to their microenvironment increases the health and wealth of the society, but asymmetries in price sensitivity between buyers and sellers increase price inflation; (3) prices for goods conferring risky long‐term benefits are not tracked efficiently by simple market forces; (4) division of labour creates synergies that improve enormously the health and wealth of the society by increasing the efficiency of economic activity; (5) stochastic modelling improves our understanding of real economies, and didactic games based on them might help policy‐makers and nonspecialists in grasping the complex dynamics underlying even simple economic settings. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaus Jaffé, 2015. "Visualizing the Invisible Hand of Markets: Simulating Complex Dynamic Economic Interactions," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 115-132, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:22:y:2015:i:2:p:115-132
    DOI: 10.1002/isaf.1368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1368
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/isaf.1368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Gonzalez-Estevez & M. G. Cosenza & O. Alvarez-Llamoza & R. Lopez-Ruiz, 2008. "Transition from Pareto to Boltzmann-Gibbs behavior in a deterministic economic model," Papers 0811.1064, arXiv.org.
    2. Smith, Adam, 1977. "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226763743 edited by Cannan, Edwin, December.
    3. Adrian Dragulescu & Victor M. Yakovenko, 2000. "Statistical mechanics of money," Papers cond-mat/0001432, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2000.
    4. Hayek, F. A., 1991. "The Fatal Conceit," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226320663 edited by Bartley, III, W. W., December.
    5. J. Gonzalez-Estevez & M. G. Cosenza & R. Lopez-Ruiz & J. R. Sanchez, 2008. "Pareto and Boltzmann-Gibbs behaviors in a deterministic multi-agent system," Papers 0801.0969, arXiv.org.
    6. Robert Axtell, 2005. "The Complexity of Exchange," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 115(504), pages 193-210, June.
    7. Klaus Jaffe & Roberto Cipriani, 2007. "Culture Outsmarts Nature in the Evolution of Cooperation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 10(1), pages 1-7.
    8. Klaus Jaffe, 2002. "An Economic Analysis of Altruism: Who Benefits from Altruistic Acts?," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5(3), pages 1-3.
    9. González-Estévez, J. & Cosenza, M.G. & López-Ruiz, R. & Sánchez, J.R., 2008. "Pareto and Boltzmann–Gibbs behaviors in a deterministic multi-agent system," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(18), pages 4637-4642.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klaus Jaffe, 2014. "Visualizing the Invisible Hand of Markets: Simulating complex dynamic economic interactions," Papers 1412.6924, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2015.
    2. Bagatella-Flores, N. & Rodríguez-Achach, M. & Coronel-Brizio, H.F. & Hernández-Montoya, A.R., 2015. "Wealth distribution of simple exchange models coupled with extremal dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 417(C), pages 168-175.
    3. Asinari, Pietro & Chiavazzo, Eliodoro, 2014. "The notion of energy through multiple scales: From a molecular level to fluid flows and beyond," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 870-876.
    4. Klaus Jaffe, 2015. "Agent based simulations visualize Adam Smith's invisible hand by solving Friedrich Hayek's Economic Calculus," Papers 1509.04264, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2015.
    5. Klaus Jaffe & Astrid Flórez & Marcos Manzanares & Rodolfo Jaffe & Cristina Gomes & Daniel Rodríguez & Carla Achury, 2015. "On the bioeconomics of shame and guilt," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 137-149, July.
    6. Klaus Jaffé, 2017. "The “Invisible Hand” of Economic Markets Can Be Visualized through the Synergy Created by Division of Labor," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-10, December.
    7. Ricardo Lopez-Ruiz & Jose-Luis Lopez & Xavier Calbet, 2011. "Exponential wealth distribution: a new approach from functional iteration theory," Papers 1103.1501, arXiv.org.
    8. R. Lopez-Ruiz & E. Shivanian & S. Abbasbandy & J. L. Lopez, 2011. "A Generalized Continuous Model for Random Markets," Papers 1104.2187, arXiv.org, revised May 2011.
    9. Yuji Aruka, 2020. "The evolution of the exchange process: from the decentralized to the distributed digital exchange," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 379-398, July.
    10. Ellis Scharfenaker, Markus P.A. Schneider, 2019. "Labor Market Segmentation and the Distribution of Income: New Evidence from Internal Census Bureau Data," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2019_08, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
    11. John Meadowcroft & Mark Pennington, 2008. "Bonding and bridging: Social capital and the communitarian critique of liberal markets," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 21(2), pages 119-133, September.
    12. Carbonnier Cl´ement, 2014. "The incidence of non-linear consumption taxes," Научный результат. Серия «Экономические исследования», CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Белгородский государственный национальный исследовательский университет», issue 1, pages 5-18.
    13. repec:voc:wpaper:tech82012 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Kimbrough, E.O. & Vostroknutov, A., 2012. "Rules, rule-following and cooperation," Research Memorandum 053, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    15. Costas Efthimiou & Adam Wearne, 2016. "Household Income Distribution in the USA," Papers 1602.06234, arXiv.org.
    16. Ricardo Lopez-Ruiz & Elyas Shivanian & Jose-Luis Lopez, 2013. "Random Market Models with an H-Theorem," Papers 1307.2169, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2014.
    17. Hutzler, S. & Sommer, C. & Richmond, P., 2016. "On the relationship between income, fertility rates and the state of democracy in society," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 452(C), pages 9-18.
    18. Teppo Felin & Stuart Kauffman & Roger Koppl & Giuseppe Longo, 2014. "Economic Opportunity and Evolution: Beyond Landscapes and Bounded Rationality," Post-Print hal-01415115, HAL.
    19. Venkatasubramanian, Venkat & Luo, Yu & Sethuraman, Jay, 2015. "How much inequality in income is fair? A microeconomic game theoretic perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 435(C), pages 120-138.
    20. E. Samanidou & E. Zschischang & D. Stauffer & T. Lux, 2001. "Microscopic Models of Financial Markets," Papers cond-mat/0110354, arXiv.org.
    21. Koppl, Roger, 2010. "Some epistemological implications of economic complexity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 859-872, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:isacfm:v:22:y:2015:i:2:p:115-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1099-1174/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.