IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intssr/v48y1995i3-4p5-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A risky strategy: Reflections on the World Bank Report Averting the old age crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Roger Beattie
  • Warren McGillivray

Abstract

This article is a critical assessment of a report on pensions recently published by the World Bank. It takes issue with the report's assertion that public pension systems have failed both socially and economically, demonstrating that many of the shortcomings identified by the World Bank apply with equal or greater force to private systems. It argues that the strategy outlined in the report, involving the replacement of social insurance by mandatory savings schemes, would involve an unacceptably high degree of risk for workers and pensioners, that it would make old‐age protection more costly, and that the transition would impose a heavy burden on the current generation of workers. The article concludes that a more efficient and less disruptive approach to the provision of retirement pension would be to focus efforts on measures to rectify design deficiencies and inequities in existing schemes.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger Beattie & Warren McGillivray, 1995. "A risky strategy: Reflections on the World Bank Report Averting the old age crisis," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(3‐4), pages 5-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:48:y:1995:i:3-4:p:5-22
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.1995.tb00443.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246X.1995.tb00443.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-246X.1995.tb00443.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barr, Nicholas, 2002. "Reforming pensions: myths, truths, and policy choices," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 286, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Maria Teresa Medeiros Garcia & André Fernando Rodrigues Rocha da Silva, 2019. "Assessing Pension Expenditure Determinants – the Case of Portugal," Working Papers REM 2019/68, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    3. Takayama, Noriyuki, 2005. "Pension Reform of PRC : ―Incentives, Governance and Policy Options―," Economic Review, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 56(4), pages 289-303, October.
    4. Augusztinovics, Mária, 1999. "Nyugdíjrendszerek és reformok az átmeneti gazdaságokban [Pension system and reforms in the transition economies]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 657-672.
    5. Heikki Hiilamo & Audrius Bitinas & Narith Chân, 2020. "Extending pension coverage in Cambodia: The governance and investment challenges of the Social Security Investment Fund," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 73(4), pages 97-116, October.
    6. Maria Teresa Medeiros Garcia & André Fernando Rodrigues Rocha da Silva, 2023. "Pension expenditure determinants: the case of Portugal," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 47(2), pages 177-203.
    7. Simonovits, András, 2024. "A népességöregedés kihívásai és újraelosztás a nyugdíjrendszerben [Population aging and redistribution in a pension system]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 833-849.
    8. Katharina Müller, 2000. "Pension privatization in Latin America," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(4), pages 507-518.
    9. Palacios, Robert & Robalino, David A., 2020. "Integrating Social Insurance and Social Assistance Programs for the Future World of Labor," IZA Discussion Papers 13258, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:48:y:1995:i:3-4:p:5-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1865-1674 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.