IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/idsxxx/v41y2010i6p75-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural Science and Technology Projects: Theories, Practices and Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Millstone
  • Patrick Van Zwanenberg
  • Fiona Marshall

Abstract

Recently there has been a realisation that agriculture, and in particular the viability and sustainability of smallholder farming, can be a key to poverty reduction in developing countries. This article reviews approaches to monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of scientific and technological innovation projects and examines how approaches to M&E can be modified or enhanced to optimise positive impacts on those intended recipients. This article concludes that innovations are most successful when they are accomplished within ‘innovation systems’; that advantage should be taken of opportunities to involve intended recipients of the innovation at early up‐stream and mid‐stream stages of projects to assess the accuracy and adequacy of theories of change; that the types of tools and methods used in carrying out M&E influence the types of data obtained; and that the cultures of research and development institutions may inhibit reciprocal communications but the development of intermediaries between institutions and farmers could make a useful difference.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Millstone & Patrick Van Zwanenberg & Fiona Marshall, 2010. "Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural Science and Technology Projects: Theories, Practices and Problems," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(6), pages 75-87, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:idsxxx:v:41:y:2010:i:6:p:75-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/idsb.2010.41.issue-6
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jana Schindler & Frieder Graef & Hannes Jochen König & Devotha Mchau, 2017. "Developing community-based food security criteria in rural Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1285-1298, December.
    2. Schindler, Jana & Graef, Frieder & König, Hannes Jochen, 2016. "Participatory impact assessment: Bridging the gap between scientists' theory and farmers' practice," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 38-43.
    3. L. E. A. Hernandez & F. Graef & H. J. König, 2019. "Participatory Impact Assessment of Food Securing Upgrading Strategies in Rural Tanzania," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 687-706, December.
    4. J. Guinea & E. Sela & A. J. Gómez-Núñez & T. Mangwende & A. Ambali & N. Ngum & H. Jaramillo & J. M. Gallego & A. Patiño & C. Latorre & S. Srivanichakorn & B. Thepthien, 2015. "Impact oriented monitoring: A new methodology for monitoring and evaluation of international public health research projects," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 131-145.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:idsxxx:v:41:y:2010:i:6:p:75-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-5012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.