IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v5y1996i3p241-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health promotion community development and the tyranny of individualism

Author

Listed:
  • A. Shiell
  • P. Hawe

Abstract

Economic evaluation of health promotion poses few major difficulties when the theoretical approach of the programme and the evaluation of cost and benefits are confined within the context of the individual. Methodological individualism has a long history in economics and the techniques of microeconomics are well suited to the examination of individually focused behaviour change programmes. However, new developments in community health promotion pose special challenges. These programmes have the community, not the individual, as the focus of programme theory and ‘community’ means something completely different from the sum of individuals. Community empowerment and promotion of the community's capacity to deal with health issues are the goals of such programmes. To reflect these notions, sense of community and community competence should be considered as ‘functionings’, an extra‐welfarist constituent of well‐being. Their inclusion as outcomes of community health promotion requires a shift from individualist utilitarian economics into a communitarian framework which respects the programme's notion of community. If health economics fails to develop new constructs to deal with these new approaches in health promotion, the application of existing techniques to community programmes will mislead health decision makers about their value and potential.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Shiell & P. Hawe, 1996. "Health promotion community development and the tyranny of individualism," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(3), pages 241-247, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:5:y:1996:i:3:p:241-247
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199605)5:33.0.CO;2-G
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199605)5:33.0.CO;2-G
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199605)5:33.0.CO;2-G?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hodgson, Geoff, 1986. "Behind Methodological Individualism," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(3), pages 211-224, September.
    2. Engleman, Stephen R. & Forbes, John F., 1986. "Economic aspects of health education," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 443-458, January.
    3. McKinlay, John B., 1993. "The promotion of health through planned sociopolitical change: Challenges for research and policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 109-117, January.
    4. Thurow, Lester, 1983. "Dangerous Currents: The State of Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198771838.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan, Stephen & Pronyk, Paul & Kim, Julia, 2008. "Accounting for institutional change in health economic evaluation: A program to tackle HIV/AIDS and gender violence in Southern Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 922-932, February.
    2. Stephen Jan, 2000. "Institutional considerations in priority setting: transactions cost perspective on PBMA," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(7), pages 631-641, October.
    3. Mooney, Gavin, 2005. "Communitarian claims and community capabilities: furthering priority setting?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 247-255, January.
    4. Thiede, Michael, 2005. "Information and access to health care: is there a role for trust?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 1452-1462, October.
    5. Stephens, Christine, 2008. "Social capital in its place: Using social theory to understand social capital and inequalities in health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 1174-1184, March.
    6. Currie, Melissa & King, Gillian & Rosenbaum, Peter & Law, Mary & Kertoy, Marilyn & Specht, Jacqueline, 2005. "A model of impacts of research partnerships in health and social services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 400-412, November.
    7. Wakefield, Sarah E.L. & Poland, Blake, 2005. "Family, friend or foe? Critical reflections on the relevance and role of social capital in health promotion and community development," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 2819-2832, June.
    8. Borghi, Josephine & Jan, Stephen, 2008. "Measuring the benefits of health promotion programmes: Application of the contingent valuation method," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 235-248, August.
    9. Nikki McCaffrey & Meera Agar & Janeane Harlum & Jonathon Karnon & David Currow & Simon Eckermann, 2015. "Better Informing Decision Making with Multiple Outcomes Cost-Effectiveness Analysis under Uncertainty in Cost-Disutility Space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Hazel Squires & James Chilcott & Ronald Akehurst & Jennifer Burr & Michael P. Kelly, 2016. "A systematic literature review of the key challenges for developing the structure of public health economic models," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(3), pages 289-298, April.
    11. Shiell, Alan, 1997. "Health outcomes are about choices and values: an economic perspective on the health outcomes movement," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 5-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sogoric, Selma & Middleton, John & Lang, Slobodan & Ivankovic, Davor & Kern, Josipa, 2005. "A naturalistic inquiry on the impact of interventions aiming to improve health and the quality of life in the community," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 153-164, January.
    2. John H Goldthorpe, 2014. "The role of education in intergenerational social mobility: Problems from empirical research in sociology and some theoretical pointers from economics," Rationality and Society, , vol. 26(3), pages 265-289, August.
    3. Frances Stillman & Anne Hartman & Barry Graubard & Elizabeth Gilpin & David Chavis & John Garcia & Lap-Ming Wun & William Lynn & Marc Manley, 1999. "The American Stop Smoking Intervention Study," Evaluation Review, , vol. 23(3), pages 259-280, June.
    4. Sabbah, Wael & Tsakos, Georgios & Sheiham, Aubrey & Watt, Richard G., 2009. "The role of health-related behaviors in the socioeconomic disparities in oral health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 298-303, January.
    5. Václav Klusoň, 2005. "O ekonomické odpovědnosti [A Word of Economic Responsibility]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2005(4), pages 435-458.
    6. Stretton, Hugh, 1996. "After Samuelson?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(10), pages 1561-1578, October.
    7. Borgonovi, Francesca, 2010. "A life-cycle approach to the analysis of the relationship between social capital and health in Britain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(11), pages 1927-1934, December.
    8. S. Abu Turab Rizvi, 2001. "Preference Formation and the Axioms of Choice," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 141-159.
    9. Richard, Lucie & Lehoux, Pascale & Breton, Eric & Denis, Jean-Louis & Labrie, Louise & Leonard, Claudine, 2004. "Implementing the ecological approach in tobacco control programs: results of a case study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 409-421, November.
    10. Michael S. Lawlor & William A. Darity & Bobbie L. Horn, 1987. "Was Keynes a Chapter Two Keynesian?," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 516-528, July.
    11. Sue O'Keefe & Lin Crase, 2007. "Public sector workers' willingness to pay for education and training: a comparison," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 10(4), pages 279-294.
    12. Jochen Hartwig, 2014. "Relative Movements of Real Wages and Output," KOF Working papers 14-355, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    13. Rudi Wielers, 1997. "The Wages Of Trust," Rationality and Society, , vol. 9(3), pages 351-371, August.
    14. Nadia Oliva & Andrea Pacella, 2016. "Does Firms¡¯ Social Responsibility Counteract Some Critical Effects of Labor Market Flexibility?," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(1), pages 109-120, March.
    15. Mark Nixon, 2007. "Satisfaction for Whom? Freedom for What? Theology and the Economic Theory of the Consumer," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 39-60, January.
    16. Irina SyssoyevaMasson & João Sousa Andrade, 2017. "Are PIIGS so Different? An Empirical Analysis of Demand and Supply Shocks," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 64(2), pages 189-222, March.
    17. Judith Sloan & Mark Wooden, 1984. "Labour Markets form the Microeconomic perspective: Implicit Contract Theory," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 17(3), pages 120-129, November.
    18. Stuart Birks, 2012. "Rethinking economics: Logical gaps – empirical to the real world," Working Papers 20121217, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    19. Audrey Dumas & Saïd Hanchane, 2008. "Qualité de la formation professionnelle initiale au Maroc et impact des actions de formation continue sur les performances des entreprises marocaines," Working Papers halshs-00382948, HAL.
    20. Leppälä, Samuli & Desrochers, Pierre, 2010. "The division of labor need not imply regional specialization," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 74(1-2), pages 137-147, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:5:y:1996:i:3:p:241-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.