IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v34y2025i4p714-726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cash‐Out Puzzle and Long‐Term Care Insurance: Welfare of the Elderly

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyan Lei
  • Chunfeng Zhang

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of diverse payment methods within long‐term care insurance (LTCI) on the well‐being of elderly individuals, encompassing both in‐kind and cash payments. Utilizing panel data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), we leverage a generalized difference‐in‐differences (DID) approach and the LTCI pilots across various Chinese cities to identify the impacts of different LTCI payment methods. Our findings indicate that an in‐kind LTCI policy significantly decreases the one‐year mortality of older adults, with significant improvements on ADL‐related care receipt as well as health status. Conversely, no significant impacts are observed under the framework of a cash LTCI policy. We term the weaker effects regarding older adults in cash LTCI policy versus in‐kind LTCI policy as “the cash‐out puzzle”. Our findings emphasize the critical importance of developing right incentives of LTCI payment schemes thoughtfully worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyan Lei & Chunfeng Zhang, 2025. "Cash‐Out Puzzle and Long‐Term Care Insurance: Welfare of the Elderly," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 714-726, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:714-726
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.4935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4935
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.4935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ando Michihito & Furuichi Masato & Kaneko Yoshihiro, 2021. "Does universal long-term care insurance boost female labor force participation? Macro-level evidence," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Sciendo & Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-50, May.
    2. Currie, Janet & Cole, Nancy, 1993. "Welfare and Child Health: The Link between AFDC Participation and Birth Weight," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(4), pages 971-985, September.
    3. Lei, Xiaoyan & Bai, Chen & Hong, Jingpeng & Liu, Hong, 2022. "Long-term care insurance and the well-being of older adults and their families: Evidence from China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    4. Serge-Christophe Kolm & Jean Mercier-Ythier, 2006. "Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity. Volume 1 : Foundations," Post-Print hal-00279613, HAL.
    5. Wei Huang & Chuanchuan Zhang, 2021. "The Power of Social Pensions: Evidence from China's New Rural Pension Scheme," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 179-205, April.
    6. Serge-Christophe Kolm & Jean Mercier-Ythier, 2006. "Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity. Volume 2 : Applications," Post-Print hal-03806448, HAL.
    7. Sugawara, Shinya & Nakamura, Jiro, 2014. "Can formal elderly care stimulate female labor supply? The Japanese experience," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 98-115.
    8. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2002. "Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(3), pages 460-501, June.
    9. Thomas M. Fraker & Alberto P. Martini & James C. Ohls, 1995. "The Effect of Food Stamp Cashout on Food Expenditures: An Assessment of the Findings from Four Demonstrations," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 30(4), pages 633-649.
    10. Liu, Hong & Ma, Jinqiu & Zhao, Liqiu, 2023. "Public long-term care insurance and consumption of elderly households: Evidence from China," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Sarah Karlsberg Schaffer, 2015. "The Effect of Free Personal Care for the Elderly on Informal Caregiving," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(S1), pages 104-117, March.
    12. Gruber, Jonathan & Lin, Mengyun & Yi, Junjian, 2023. "The largest insurance program in history: Saving one million lives per year in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    13. Kim, Hoolda & Mitra, Sophie, 2022. "The Economic and Health Effects of Long-Term Care Insurance: New Evidence from Korea," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    14. Linda Partridge & Joris Deelen & P. Eline Slagboom, 2018. "Facing up to the global challenges of ageing," Nature, Nature, vol. 561(7721), pages 45-56, September.
    15. Sen, Amartya, 1988. "Freedom of choice : Concept and content," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2-3), pages 269-294, March.
    16. Fraker, Thomas M., 1990. "The Effects of Food Stamps on Food Consumption: A Review of the Literature," USDA Miscellaneous 338580, United States Department of Agriculture.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miao Guo & Yang Li & Minghao Wu & Terence C. Cheng, 2024. "Services and Cash: How Long-term Care Insurance Benefit Design Affects Household Behavior in China," Papers 2024-13, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University.
    2. Akira Yakita, 2024. "Old-age support policy and fertility with strategic bequest motives," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Shao, Zhanqiang & Chen, Chen, 2024. "Impact of long-term care insurance on the financial asset allocation of middle-aged and elderly households: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PC).
    4. Ding, Xiangyuan & Yuan, Luoqi & Zhou, Yi, 2023. "Internet access and older adults' health: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Ai, Jingyi & Feng, Jin & Zhang, Xiaohan, 2024. "Long-term care insurance coverage and labor force participation of older people: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    6. Kairan Zhang & Yujia Liu & Hongwei Hu, 2024. "Multidimensional Poverty and Disability of Older Adults in China: Will Long-Term Care Insurance Make a Difference?," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 19(6), pages 3439-3462, December.
    7. Jesse Cunha, 2010. "Testing Paternalism: Cash vs. In-kind Transfer in Rural Mexico," Discussion Papers 09-021, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    8. Jiayi Wen & Xiaoqing Yu, 2024. "Insuring Long-Term Care in Developing Countries: The Interaction between Formal and Informal Insurance," Papers 2408.14243, arXiv.org.
    9. Yang, Tianli & Zhao, Zhong, 2025. "Public Long-Term Care Insurance and Retirement Intentions of Urban Workers: Evidence from China," IZA Discussion Papers 17642, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Erik Hembre & Katherine McElroy & Shogher Ohannessian, 2024. "Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and food expenditures: Evaluating California's cash‐out policy," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(3), pages 544-573, July.
    11. Ugo Gentilini, 2014. "Our Daily Bread : What is the Evidence on Comparing Cash versus Food Transfers?," World Bank Publications - Reports 19981, The World Bank Group.
    12. Wang, Mingzhe & Huang, Hai & Xiong, Jie & Yuan, Zhe & Zeng, Keya, 2023. "Impact of ecological reserves on the local residents’ health: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    13. Joan COSTA‐FONT & Christophe Courbage & Katherine Swartz, 2015. "Financing Long‐Term Care: Ex Ante, Ex Post or Both?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(S1), pages 45-57, March.
    14. Verónica Amarante & Marco Manacorda & Edward Miguel & Andrea Vigorito, 2016. "Do Cash Transfers Improve Birth Outcomes? Evidence from Matched Vital Statistics, Program, and Social Security Data," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-43, May.
    15. Hope Corman & Dhaval Dave & Nancy E. Reichman, 2018. "Evolution of the Infant Health Production Function," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(1), pages 6-47, July.
    16. Suzumura, Kotaro & Xu, Yongsheng, 2001. "Characterizations of Consequentialism and Nonconsequentialism," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 423-436, December.
    17. Catherine Locatelli & Sylvain Rossiaud, 2011. "A neoinstitutionalist interpretation of the changes in the Russian oil model," Post-Print halshs-00631115, HAL.
    18. Ryckembusch, David & Frega, Romeo & Silva, Marcio Guilherme & Gentilini, Ugo & Sanogo, Issa & Grede, Nils & Brown, Lynn, 2013. "Enhancing Nutrition: A New Tool for Ex-Ante Comparison of Commodity-based Vouchers and Food Transfers," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 58-67.
    19. Barbera, S. & Bossert, W. & Pattanaik, P.K., 2001. "Ranking Sets of Objects," Cahiers de recherche 2001-02, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    20. Thore, Sten, 2022. "Sustainable development goal deficits and the Covid 19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:714-726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.