IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v34y2025i4p714-726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cash‐Out Puzzle and Long‐Term Care Insurance: Welfare of the Elderly

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyan Lei
  • Chunfeng Zhang

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of diverse payment methods within long‐term care insurance (LTCI) on the well‐being of elderly individuals, encompassing both in‐kind and cash payments. Utilizing panel data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), we leverage a generalized difference‐in‐differences (DID) approach and the LTCI pilots across various Chinese cities to identify the impacts of different LTCI payment methods. Our findings indicate that an in‐kind LTCI policy significantly decreases the one‐year mortality of older adults, with significant improvements on ADL‐related care receipt as well as health status. Conversely, no significant impacts are observed under the framework of a cash LTCI policy. We term the weaker effects regarding older adults in cash LTCI policy versus in‐kind LTCI policy as “the cash‐out puzzle”. Our findings emphasize the critical importance of developing right incentives of LTCI payment schemes thoughtfully worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyan Lei & Chunfeng Zhang, 2025. "Cash‐Out Puzzle and Long‐Term Care Insurance: Welfare of the Elderly," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 714-726, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:714-726
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.4935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4935
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.4935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:4:p:714-726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.