IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v7y2017i6p1050-1064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretation of above†zone pressure influence time to characterize CO2 leakage

Author

Listed:
  • Mehdi Zeidouni
  • Nam H. Tran
  • Muhammad D. Munawar

Abstract

Pressure transient analysis has long been used to characterize underground geological formations. Pressure is monitored for evaluating the containment of injected CO2 in the target formations in CO2 geological storage. Pressure interference testing in a permeable zone overlying the storage zone can determine migration of CO2 from the target reservoir. This study focuses on interpretation of interference tests in the above†zone to obtain information on the plume size from pressure influence time. We define a conceptual model with idealization of the CO2 leakage scenario into a 3†region linear composite system. For each region of this system, the governing pressure diffusivity equations and corresponding initial and boundary conditions are presented. An analytical solution is derived by sequentially transforming the equation system into Laplace and Fourier domains. The analytical solution is verified by comparing to numerical simulation results and a limiting analytical solution. Next, the ability of the analytical solution to predict the pressure influence time for an interference test is evaluated. It is shown that the pressure influence time is independent of the plume shape and depends only on the plume size on the line connecting the two interference test wells. This suggests that the measured pressure influence time can be inverted using our analytical solution to obtain the leaked plume size. The influence time is used for an example field application to obtain the plume volume percentage. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehdi Zeidouni & Nam H. Tran & Muhammad D. Munawar, 2017. "Interpretation of above†zone pressure influence time to characterize CO2 leakage," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(6), pages 1050-1064, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:7:y:2017:i:6:p:1050-1064
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1698
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.1698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Court & Thomas Elliot & Joseph Dammel & Thomas Buscheck & Jeremy Rohmer & Michael Celia, 2012. "Promising synergies to address water, sequestration, legal, and public acceptance issues associated with large-scale implementation of CO 2 sequestration," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 569-599, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tian Qiao & Hussein Hoteit & Marwan Fahs, 2021. "Semi-Analytical Solution to Assess CO 2 Leakage in the Subsurface through Abandoned Wells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen Li & Yuxi Liu & Siqi Xiao & Yu Zhang & Lihe Chai, 2018. "An Investigation of the Underlying Evolution of Shale Gas Research’s Domain Based on the Co-Word Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Lan-Cui Liu & Qi Li & Jiu-Tian Zhang & Dong Cao, 2016. "Toward a framework of environmental risk management for CO 2 geological storage in china: gaps and suggestions for future regulations," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 191-207, February.
    3. Sharmina, Maria, 2017. "Low-carbon scenarios for Russia's energy system: A participative backcasting approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 303-315.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:7:y:2017:i:6:p:1050-1064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.