IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fufsci/v2y2020i2ne29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the facilitator of a scenario development activity need substantive knowledge of the focal topic?

Author

Listed:
  • George Wright
  • George Cairns

Abstract

This short paper focuses on the facilitation of scenario development activity using the intuitive logics method. Counter‐intuitively, substantive knowledge of the focal scenario topic is not crucial. More important is the facilitator's active, intelligent involvement with participants over the whole of the scenario development process. In scenario development within a single organization, it is useful to have an assistant from the host organization who has both substantive knowledge of the focal topic and an interest in learning about scenario thinking. Within multi‐agency interventions, important issues for the facilitator to resolve are the potentially conflicted goals of participants and the extent of the involvement of senior‐level decision makers.

Suggested Citation

  • George Wright & George Cairns, 2020. "Does the facilitator of a scenario development activity need substantive knowledge of the focal topic?," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:2:y:2020:i:2:n:e29
    DOI: 10.1002/ffo2.29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.29
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ffo2.29?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shardul Sharad Phadnis & Inga‐Lena Darkow, 2021. "Scenario planning as a strategy process to foster supply chain adaptability: theoretical framework and longitudinal case," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), June.
    2. Nicholas J. Rowland & Matthew J. Spaniol, 2021. "On inquiry in futures and foresight science," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), March.
    3. Hanna Heino, 2021. "Knowledge creation and mobility in and through futures workshops," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:2:y:2020:i:2:n:e29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2573-5152 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.