IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fufsci/v1y2019i2ne15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public understanding of futures & foresight science: A reply to Chermack’s response

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas J. Rowland
  • Matthew J. Spaniol

Abstract

In this essay, which is a reply to Chermack’s (2019) response to our article, the authors develop the most constructive feedback in the aforementioned response essay and then respond to more critical comments. As we shall see, in parallel with science and technology studies (STS) literature on the public understanding of science, the authors propose the utility of research on the “public understanding of futures and foresight science;” after that, the authors defend and add context to some of the decisions that had to be made in establishing the scope and framework for the article “Defining scenario” (Spaniol & Rowland, 2019). [Correction added on 13 May 2019, after first online publication: typographical errors in the citations of Chermack (2019) and Spaniol & Rowland (2019) have been corrected.].

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas J. Rowland & Matthew J. Spaniol, 2019. "Public understanding of futures & foresight science: A reply to Chermack’s response," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:1:y:2019:i:2:n:e15
    DOI: 10.1002/ffo2.15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.15
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ffo2.15?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas J. Chermack, 2019. "Response to Spaniol and Rowland: “Defining Scenario”," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicholas J. Rowland & Matthew J. Spaniol, 2021. "On inquiry in futures and foresight science," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Fergnani & Thomas J. Chermack, 2021. "The resistance to scientific theory in futures and foresight, and what to do about it," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(3-4), September.
    2. Hanna Heino, 2021. "Knowledge creation and mobility in and through futures workshops," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:1:y:2019:i:2:n:e15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2573-5152 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.