IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/finmar/v26y2017i5p249-277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does political pressure matter in bank lending? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Weixing Cai
  • Fangming Xu
  • Cheng Zeng

Abstract

Using provincial data from China between 2002 and 2011, we find substantial evidence indicating a positive association between the growth of bank loans issued by commercial banks and the political pressures faced by provincial leaders. This association is particularly true for state‐owned banks, which are much more politically pressurized than others, but is relatively attenuated in provinces with a more developed banking sector. We also find that bank loans issued under greater political pressures are less commercially oriented and have lower quality. Our findings are robust to a variety of sensitivity analyses and alternative measures of political pressure. Overall, our study contribute to a growing literature emphasizing the role of the political incentives of government officials in fuelling economic growth through credit allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Weixing Cai & Fangming Xu & Cheng Zeng, 2017. "Does political pressure matter in bank lending? Evidence from China," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 249-277, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:finmar:v:26:y:2017:i:5:p:249-277
    DOI: 10.1111/fmii.12089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.12089
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fmii.12089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:finmar:v:26:y:2017:i:5:p:249-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.