IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/finmar/v13y2004i3p109-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Makes Circuit Breakers Attractive to Financial Markets? A Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Yong H. Kim
  • J. Jimmy Yang

Abstract

After the stock market crash of October 1987, the Brady Report (1988) and several academic researchers suggested the imposition of “circuit breakers” to prevent the market from fluctuating excessively. Most financial markets in the world have imposed circuit breaker systems, in the form of price limits and trading halts, in an attempt to reduce excessive market volatility. Similar to any other regulations, circuit breakers have proponents and opponents. In this survey, we analyze the benefits and costs of each type of circuit breaker, provide existing theoretical models and predictions related to each type of circuit breaker, and present findings from empirical studies to justify or disqualify the existence of circuit breakers. In addition, we synthesize existing studies and offer directions for further research in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong H. Kim & J. Jimmy Yang, 2004. "What Makes Circuit Breakers Attractive to Financial Markets? A Survey," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 109-146, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:finmar:v:13:y:2004:i:3:p:109-146
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-8008.2004.00074.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-8008.2004.00074.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0963-8008.2004.00074.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:finmar:v:13:y:2004:i:3:p:109-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.