IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v32y2021i6ne2685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the duration and size of wildfires using joint mixture models

Author

Listed:
  • Dexen D. Z. Xi
  • Charmaine B. Dean
  • Stephen W. Taylor

Abstract

Fire duration and fire size are key outcomes for quantifying the survivorship of extended attack fires, here considered to be fires with duration greater than 2 days and size greater than 4 ha. Past studies suggest that these key outcomes are correlated. As well, fire behavior, linked to hidden effects, tends to yield that fires arise from different subpopulations. Indeed, it is not unusual for fire behavior to be identified as arising from normal or extreme subpopulations, for example. Here, we embed these two concepts into a new framework for jointly modeling fire duration and fire size. We develop a bivariate finite mixture framework that can be used to model duration and size with four subpopulations of the outcomes whereby duration and size are either normal or extreme. We utilize a shared random effect model as well as a bivariate Gaussian mixture model for such mixture modeling. We also incorporate the effect of explanatory variables associated with each fire event, on the posterior probability of the component that the fire belongs to, through a Dirichlet model. In an analysis of fire outcomes from British Columbia, Canada, we find that the majority of the fires are of normal or extreme magnitude in both outcomes, with strong evidence indicating correlation between duration and size. The effect of fire center, month, and several environmental covariates are identified as key predictors and we are able to determine through these approaches how these covariates differentially affect the four subpopulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Dexen D. Z. Xi & Charmaine B. Dean & Stephen W. Taylor, 2021. "Modeling the duration and size of wildfires using joint mixture models," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:32:y:2021:i:6:n:e2685
    DOI: 10.1002/env.2685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2685
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.2685?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoder, Jonathan & Gebert, Krista, 2012. "An econometric model for ex ante prediction of wildfire suppression costs," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 76-89.
    2. Robin Henderson, 2003. "A serially correlated gamma frailty model for longitudinal count data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(2), pages 355-366, June.
    3. Keefe Murphy & Thomas Brendan Murphy, 2020. "Gaussian parsimonious clustering models with covariates and a noise component," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 14(2), pages 293-325, June.
    4. D. B. Dunson, 2000. "Bayesian latent variable models for clustered mixed outcomes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(2), pages 355-366.
    5. Pier-Olivier Tremblay & Thierry Duchesne & Steven G Cumming, 2018. "Survival analysis and classification methods for forest fire size," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Dexen DZ. Xi & C.B. Dean & Stephen W. Taylor, 2020. "Modeling the duration and size of extended attack wildfires as dependent outcomes," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), August.
    7. C.X. Feng & C.B. Dean, 2012. "Joint analysis of multivariate spatial count and zero‐heavy count outcomes using common spatial factor models," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(6), pages 493-508, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dexen DZ. Xi & C.B. Dean & Stephen W. Taylor, 2020. "Modeling the duration and size of extended attack wildfires as dependent outcomes," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), August.
    2. Marco Minozzo & Luca Bagnato, 2021. "A unified skew‐normal geostatistical factor model," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), June.
    3. Emilio Augusto Coelho-Barros & Jorge Alberto Achcar & Josmar Mazucheli, 2010. "Longitudinal Poisson modeling: an application for CD4 counting in HIV-infected patients," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 865-880.
    4. Ali Noudoostbeni & Kiran Kaur & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, 2018. "A Comparison of Structural Equation Modeling Approaches with DeLone & McLean’s Model: A Case Study of Radio-Frequency Identification User Satisfaction in Malaysian University Libraries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Luo, Chongliang & Liang, Jian & Li, Gen & Wang, Fei & Zhang, Changshui & Dey, Dipak K. & Chen, Kun, 2018. "Leveraging mixed and incomplete outcomes via reduced-rank modeling," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 378-394.
    6. Leila Amiri & Mojtaba Khazaei & Mojtaba Ganjali, 2018. "A mixture latent variable model for modeling mixed data in heterogeneous populations and its applications," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(1), pages 95-115, January.
    7. Chaoubi, Ihsan & Cossette, Hélène & Marceau, Etienne & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Hierarchical copulas with Archimedean blocks and asymmetric between-block pairs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. van den Berg, Gerard J. & Effraimidis, Georgios, 2014. "Dependence Measures in Bivariate Gamma Frailty Models," IZA Discussion Papers 8083, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. E. Juarez‐Colunga & G. L. Silva & C. B. Dean, 2017. "Joint modeling of zero‐inflated panel count and severity outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 1413-1423, December.
    10. Assaf, A. George & Tsionas, Mike & Oh, Haemoon, 2018. "The time has come: Toward Bayesian SEM estimation in tourism research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 98-109.
    11. Mohamad Khoirun Najib & Sri Nurdiati & Ardhasena Sopaheluwakan, 2022. "Multivariate fire risk models using copula regression in Kalimantan, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 1263-1283, September.
    12. Michel Denuit & Yang Lu, 2021. "Wishart‐gamma random effects models with applications to nonlife insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(2), pages 443-481, June.
    13. H. Zhang & Q. Yu & C. Feng & D. Gunzler & P. Wu & X. M. Tu, 2012. "A new look at the difference between the GEE and the GLMM when modeling longitudinal count responses," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(9), pages 2067-2079, June.
    14. Maombi Mbusa Masinda & Fei Li & Liu Qi & Long Sun & Tongxin Hu, 2022. "Forest fire risk estimation in a typical temperate forest in Northeastern China using the Canadian forest fire weather index: case study in autumn 2019 and 2020," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(1), pages 1085-1101, March.
    15. D. B. Woodard & T. M. T. Love & S. W. Thurston & D. Ruppert & S. Sathyanarayana & S. H. Swan, 2013. "Latent factor regression models for grouped outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 785-794, September.
    16. Takahiro Hoshino & Ryosuke Igari, 2017. "Quasi-Bayesian Inference for Latent Variable Models with External Information: Application to generalized linear mixed models for biased data," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2017-014, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    17. Thompson, Matthew P. & Haas, Jessica R. & Finney, Mark A. & Calkin, David E. & Hand, Michael S. & Browne, Mark J. & Halek, Martin & Short, Karen C. & Grenfell, Isaac C., 2015. "Development and application of a probabilistic method for wildfire suppression cost modeling," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 249-258.
    18. David B. Dunson & Donna D. Baird, 2002. "Bayesian Modeling of Incidence and Progression of Disease from Cross-Sectional Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 813-822, December.
    19. Yang, Mingan & Dunson, David B. & Baird, Donna, 2010. "Semiparametric Bayes hierarchical models with mean and variance constraints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(9), pages 2172-2186, September.
    20. Che Wan Jasimah Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi & Maisarah Binti Hasbullah, 2015. "Firm Sustainability Performance Index Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:32:y:2021:i:6:n:e2685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.