IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/eldpol/v2y2022i1p29-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Chosen Child: Characteristics of Family Caregivers Selected at an Early Age to Provide Care to Their Parents

Author

Listed:
  • Joanne R. Campione
  • Katarzyna A. Zebrak

Abstract

Background and Objective Family caregivers who have been chosen by their family for the caregiving role may be under a unique type of stress due to familism and/or lack of choice. The purpose of this exploratory analysis was to investigate the characteristics of family caregivers who self‐identified as the “Chosen Child” caregiver. Methods We used survey data from 652 child caregivers collected in December 2016 as part of the outcome evaluation of the National Family Caregiver Support Program (NFCSP). We compared the characteristics between the caregivers who responded “definitely true” when asked if they were chosen by their family as a child to provide care (“Chosen Child”) and the caregivers who answered “definitely false” to chosen child (DFCC). Results Compared to DFCC caregivers (n=214), Chosen Child caregivers (n=168) experienced emotional distress more often (p=0.009), were more likely to have annual household income ≤$40,000 (p=0.018), were less likely to be employed (p=0.009), and were less likely to have received respite care in the past 6 months from family or friends (p=0.009). The mean emotional distress score remained significantly different between Chosen Child and DFCC caregivers after adjusting for potential confounders (2.64 vs. 2.43, respectively). Conclusion Family and friends should be aware that the Chosen Child caregiver may be at risk for emotional distress and may be hesitant to ask for respite care or other types of support. Interventions for the Chosen Child should help them seek support when needed. Antecedentes y objetivo Los cuidadores familiares que han sido elegidos por su familia para el rol de cuidador pueden estar bajo un tipo único de estrés debido al familiarismo y/o la falta de elección. El propósito de este análisis exploratorio fue investigar las características de los cuidadores familiares que se autoidentificaron como el cuidador del “Niño Elegido”. Métodos Utilizamos datos de encuestas de 652 cuidadores de niños recopilados en diciembre de 2016 como parte de la evaluación de resultados del Programa Nacional de Apoyo a Cuidadores Familiares (NFCSP). Comparamos las características entre los cuidadores que respondieron “definitivamente cierto” cuando se les preguntó si fueron elegidos por su familia cuando eran niños para brindar cuidado (“Niño elegido”) y los cuidadores que respondieron “definitivamente falso” al niño elegido (DFCC). Resultados En comparación con los cuidadores de DFCC (n=214), los cuidadores de niños elegidos (n=168) experimentaron angustia emocional con más frecuencia (p=0,009), tenían más probabilidades de tener un ingreso familiar anual ≤$40 000 (p=0,018), tenían menos probabilidades de ser empleados (p=0,009), y tenían menos probabilidades de haber recibido cuidados de relevo en los últimos 6 meses de familiares o amigos (p=0,009). La puntuación media de angustia emocional siguió siendo significativamente diferente entre los cuidadores de Chosen Child y DFCC después de ajustar los posibles factores de confusión (2,64 frente a 2,43, respectivamente). Conclusión Los familiares y amigos deben ser conscientes de que el cuidador del niño elegido puede estar en riesgo de sufrir angustia emocional y puede dudar en solicitar cuidados de relevo u otros tipos de apoyo. Las intervenciones para el Niño Elegido deberían ayudarlo a buscar apoyo cuando sea necesario. 背景和目标:由家庭指定承担照顾角色的家庭照顾者可能由 于家庭主义和/或缺乏选择而遭受独特的压力。本探究性分 析旨在研究自我认定为“被选中的孩子”的家庭照顾者的特 征。 方法:我们使用652名儿童照顾者的调查数据,该数据收集 于2016年12月并作为国家家庭照顾者支持计划(NFCSP)成 果评价的一部分。我们比较了当被问及是否在儿童时期被家 人选择提供护理时回答“绝对正确”的照顾者(“被选中的 孩子”)和对此回答“绝对错误”的照顾者(DFCC)的特 征。 结果:与DFCC照顾者(n=214)相比,“被选中的孩子”照顾 者(n=168)经历情感痛苦的频率更高(p=0.009),家庭年 收入⩽40,000美元的可能性更大(p=0.018),不太可能被雇 用 (p=0.009),并且在过去6个月内从家人或朋友那里得到 临时托护的可能性较小(p=0.009)。在调整了潜在的干扰因 素后,“被选中的孩子”和DFCC照顾者的平均情感痛苦评分 仍然存在显著差异(分别为2.64和2.43)。 结论:家人和朋友应该意识到,“被选中的孩子”照顾者可 能有情感痛苦的风险,并且可能不愿寻求临时托护或其他类 型的支持。对“被选中的孩子”的干预措施应帮助其在需要 时寻求支持。

Suggested Citation

  • Joanne R. Campione & Katarzyna A. Zebrak, 2022. "The Chosen Child: Characteristics of Family Caregivers Selected at an Early Age to Provide Care to Their Parents," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(1), pages 29-49, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:eldpol:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:29-49
    DOI: 10.18278/jep.2.1.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.18278/jep.2.1.2
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18278/jep.2.1.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rafael del-Pino-Casado & Marta Rodríguez Cardosa & Catalina López-Martínez & Vasiliki Orgeta, 2019. "The association between subjective caregiver burden and depressive symptoms in carers of older relatives: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Norma B. Coe & Courtney Harold Van Houtven, 2009. "Caring for mom and neglecting yourself? The health effects of caring for an elderly parent," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(9), pages 991-1010, September.
    3. Peggye Dilworth-Anderson & Paula Y. Goodwin & Sharon Wallace Williams, 2004. "Can Culture Help Explain the Physical Health Effects of Caregiving Over Time Among African American Caregivers?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 59(3), pages 138-145.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heger, Dörte & Korfhage, Thorben, 2017. "Does the negative effect of caregiving on work persist over time?," Ruhr Economic Papers 703, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    2. Urwin, Sean & Lau, Yiu-Shing & Grande, Gunn & Sutton, Matt, 2021. "The extent and predictors of discrepancy between provider and recipient reports of informal caregiving," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    3. Kolodziej, Ingo & Coe, Norma B. & Van Houtven, Courtney Harold, 2023. "Intensive informal care and impairments in work productivity and activity," Ruhr Economic Papers 1010, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    4. Kaschowitz, Judith & Brandt, Martina, 2017. "Health effects of informal caregiving across Europe: A longitudinal approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 72-80.
    5. Oshio, Takashi & Usui, Emiko, 2017. "The effects of providing eldercare on daughters’ employment and mental health in Japan," CIS Discussion paper series 661, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    6. Brenna, Elenka, 2021. "Should I care for my mum or for my kid? Sandwich generation and depression burden in Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 415-423.
    7. Mommaerts, Corina & Truskinovsky, Yulya, 2020. "The cyclicality of informal care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    8. Yoko Niimi, 2016. "The “Costs” of informal care: an analysis of the impact of elderly care on caregivers’ subjective well-being in Japan," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 779-810, December.
    9. Canta, Chiara & Cremer, Helmuth, 2019. "Long-term care policy with nonlinear strategic bequests," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 548-566.
    10. Perla Werner & Aviad Tur-Sinai & Hanan AboJabel, 2021. "Examining Dementia Family Caregivers’ Forgone Care for General Practitioners and Medical Specialists during a COVID-19 Lockdown," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-11, April.
    11. Young Kyung Do & Edward C. Norton & Sally C. Stearns & Courtney Harold Van Houtven, 2015. "Informal Care and Caregiver's Health," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 224-237, February.
    12. Kuo-Liang Chang & George Langelett & Andrew Waugh, 2011. "Health, Health Insurance, and Decision to Exit from Farming," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 356-372, June.
    13. Amitabh Chandra & Courtney Coile & Corina Mommaerts, 2023. "What Can Economics Say about Alzheimer's Disease?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(2), pages 428-470, June.
    14. Carole Bonnet & Sandrine Juin & Anne Laferrère, 2019. "Private Financing of Long‑Term Care: Income, Savings and Reverse Mortgages," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 507-508, pages 5-24.
    15. Michael Grossman, 2022. "The demand for health turns 50: Reflections," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(9), pages 1807-1822, September.
    16. repec:zbw:rwirep:0426 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Elenka Brenna & Cinzia Di Novi, 2013. "Is caring for elderly parents detrimental to women’s mental health? The influence of the European North-South gradient," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza def004, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    18. Meliyanni Johar & Shiko Maruyama, 2011. "Intergenerational cohabitation in modern Indonesia: filial support and dependence," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(S1), pages 87-104, September.
    19. Jingyi Ai & Jin Feng & Yangyang Yu, 2022. "Elderly Care Provision and the Impact on Caregiver Health in China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 30(5), pages 206-226, September.
    20. Marie Blaise & Laetitia Dillenseger, 2020. "Informal caregivers and life satisfaction: Empirical Evidence from the Netherlands," Working Papers of BETA 2020-55, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    21. Costa-Font, Joan & Raut, Nilesh & Van Houtven, Courtney, 2021. "Medicaid Expansion and the Mental Health of Spousal Caregivers," IZA Discussion Papers 14754, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:eldpol:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:29-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.