IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i10p2181-2192..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of Unmet Need Among Informal Caregivers

Author

Listed:
  • Joanne R Campione
  • Katarzyna A Zebrak
  • Candace Kemp

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study investigates the relationship of caregiver demographics, caregiving intensity, caregiver support use, and aspects of the caregiving situation to a self-reported measure of unmet need among U.S. informal caregivers of older adults living at home with various conditions.MethodsResponse data from 1,558 caregiver participants interviewed by telephone during the December 2016 baseline period of the Outcome Evaluation of the National Family Caregiver Support Program were used. Caregivers who responded “Definitely No” to the question “Are you receiving all the help you need?” were classified as reporting unmet need. Logistic regression was used to find significant factors associated with unmet need among the full sample and among caregivers tiered by three levels of burden.ResultsUnmet need was reported by 22% of the caregivers. In a fully adjusted model, unmet need was predicted by higher levels of caregiving intensity, non-White race of the caregiver, and the caregiver not feeling appreciated by their care recipient. Other predictors associated with unmet need were no use of caregiver educational services, fewer respite hours, not living in a rural area, and caregiver having an education past high school.DiscussionCaregivers who do not feel appreciated by their care recipient and non-White caregivers should be identified as potential targets for intervention to address unmet need, especially if they are also reporting higher levels of caregiver burden. Understanding the factors associated with self-reported unmet need can assist caregiver support programs in measuring and addressing the needs of informal caregivers to support their continued caregiving.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanne R Campione & Katarzyna A Zebrak & Candace Kemp, 2020. "Predictors of Unmet Need Among Informal Caregivers," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(10), pages 2181-2192.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:10:p:2181-2192.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz165
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Lee Smith & Caroline D. Bergeron & Ledric D. Sherman & Kirby Goidel & Ashley L. Merianos, 2022. "Contextualizing the Chronic Care Model among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic Men with Chronic Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:10:p:2181-2192.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.