IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v31y2024i5p4980-4994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does internal control improve enterprise environmental, social, and governance information disclosure? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jialin Yan
  • Haibo Hu
  • Yiruo Hu

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) is a relatively new concept that emphasizes how to contribute to creating sustainable businesses. However, research on factors that influence ESG development is insufficient. This study explores how internal control influence enterprise ESG information disclosure, using 2009–2021 data from China's A‐share listed companies. The findings show a substantial positive correlation between internal control quality and corporate ESG information disclosure. Particularly, the internal control quality significantly affects corporate governance information disclosure. Moreover, the connection between internal control quality and enterprise ESG information disclosure is significantly and positively moderated by media attention. Specifically, negative media evaluations have significant impacts on enterprises. The main findings remain valid even after conducting multiple robustness tests, such as the lag test, propensity score matching, instrumental variable method, and alternative measurements for the key variables. This study widens the theoretical research frontier of internal and external supervision mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Jialin Yan & Haibo Hu & Yiruo Hu, 2024. "Does internal control improve enterprise environmental, social, and governance information disclosure? Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4980-4994, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:4980-4994
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2837
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2837?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:4980-4994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.