IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v31y2024i5p4329-4344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do firms react to capital market liberalization? Evidence from ESG reporting greenwashing

Author

Listed:
  • Guangrui Liu
  • Hao Qian
  • Yong Shi
  • Deli Yuan
  • Ming Zhou

Abstract

Based on catering theory, this study employs a difference‐in‐differences model to investigate the impact of capital market liberalization on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting greenwashing using mainland Hong Kong Connection Programs as a quasinatural experiment. Our findings indicate that corporate management increasingly engages in ESG reporting greenwashing in capital market liberalization to cater to foreign investors. This conclusion remains valid after controlling for endogeneity. Mechanistic analysis indicates that investor sentiment increases with capital market liberalization. In response, corporate management intensifies ESG reporting greenwashing to cater to foreign investors, and analysts' focus does not serve as a supervisory mechanism for restraining ESG reports greenwashing. Heterogeneity tests demonstrate that ESG reports greenwashing within the capital market diminishes for mandatory disclosure and state‐owned firms. However, ESG reports greenwashing intensifies among firms facing high financing constraints amid capital market liberalization. Overall, we identify a significant catering effect on ESG reporting amid capital market liberalization, offering a novel theoretical framework on greenwashing in ESG disclosures.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangrui Liu & Hao Qian & Yong Shi & Deli Yuan & Ming Zhou, 2024. "How do firms react to capital market liberalization? Evidence from ESG reporting greenwashing," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4329-4344, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:4329-4344
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2808
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:4329-4344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.