IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v96y2024ipas1057521924005556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does social responsibility reform curb corporate greenwashing: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Ziyang
  • Luo, Tao
  • Li, Jiangyi
  • Tian, Yihao

Abstract

Greenwashing has significantly impeded the advancement of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and undermined the sustainable finance. To better fulfill the social responsibility of corporations, the Chinese government spearheaded reforms among state-owned enterprises in 2016. Using data of China's A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2021, this study uses a difference-in-differences (DID) model to investigate the effects of the social responsibility reform on corporate greenwashing. We find that social responsibility reform significantly restrains corporate greenwashing, and this effect is heterogeneous by firm characteristics. The mechanism analysis indicates that the improvement of firms' environmental performance disclosure behavior and the moderation of external regulatory pressure from the CSRC are important channels for restricting corporate greenwashing. Overall, our findings provide new insights into reducing corporate greenwash behavior and offer microscopic evidence for the objective evaluation of the effects of China's social responsibility reform.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Ziyang & Luo, Tao & Li, Jiangyi & Tian, Yihao, 2024. "Does social responsibility reform curb corporate greenwashing: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pa:s1057521924005556
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924005556
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103623?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Greenwashing; Social responsibility reform; ESG; Difference-in-differences; China;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • D90 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - General
    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:96:y:2024:i:pa:s1057521924005556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.