IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v29y2022i6p1968-1979.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multidimensional scorecard of KPIs for retrofit measures of buildings: A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Urbinati
  • Davide Chiaroni
  • Paolo Maccarrone
  • Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli
  • Federico Frattini

Abstract

The debate on retrofit of buildings has flourished in recent years and it has raised the interest of a growing number of researchers and practitioners. However, current research still lacks a holistic and systemic approach for measuring building retrofitting. The paper presents the results of a systematic literature review on the current state‐of‐the‐art of retrofit measures and their related KPIs for buildings, with the aim to develop a comprehensive and integrated scorecard. In particular, the paper considers several perspectives of building retrofitting, spanning from the areas of sustainability performance to measurement systems in the building industry, and presents and discusses a multidimensional scorecard of KPIs that clusters—from an economic, environmental, and social perspective—the current state‐of‐the‐art of retrofit measures on buildings. Further avenues for research in this field are illustrated and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Urbinati & Davide Chiaroni & Paolo Maccarrone & Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli & Federico Frattini, 2022. "A multidimensional scorecard of KPIs for retrofit measures of buildings: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 1968-1979, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:6:p:1968-1979
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2294
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.2294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bas J. van Ruijven & Enrica De Cian & Ian Sue Wing, 2019. "Amplification of future energy demand growth due to climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Umberto Berardi, 2012. "Sustainability Assessment in the Construction Sector: Rating Systems and Rated Buildings," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(6), pages 411-424, November.
    3. Cory Searcy & Daryl McCartney & Stanislav Karapetrovic, 2007. "Sustainable development indicators for the transmission system of an electric utility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 135-151, July.
    4. P. D. Rwelamila & A. A. Talukhaba & A. B. Ngowi, 2000. "Project procurement systems in the attainment of sustainable construction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(1), pages 39-50.
    5. Waltman, Ludo, 2016. "A review of the literature on citation impact indicators," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 365-391.
    6. Collins, Matthew & Curtis, John, 2016. "An Examination of Energy Efficiency Retrofit Depth in Ireland," Papers WP532, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    7. Francesca Pagliaro & Lucia Cellucci & Chiara Burattini & Fabio Bisegna & Franco Gugliermetti & Andrea De Lieto Vollaro & Ferdinando Salata & Iacopo Golasi, 2015. "A Methodological Comparison between Energy and Environmental Performance Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Claudio Favi & Elisa Di Giuseppe & Marco D’Orazio & Marta Rossi & Michele Germani, 2018. "Building Retrofit Measures and Design: A Probabilistic Approach for LCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Stefan Schaltegger & Marcus Wagner, 2006. "Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19.
    10. Perkmann, Markus & Tartari, Valentina & McKelvey, Maureen & Autio, Erkko & Broström, Anders & D’Este, Pablo & Fini, Riccardo & Geuna, Aldo & Grimaldi, Rosa & Hughes, Alan & Krabel, Stefan & Kitson, Mi, 2013. "Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 423-442.
    11. Valentina Cillo & Sylvaine Castellano & Olivier Lamotte & Lorenzo Ardito & Manlio Del Giudice, 2022. "The managerial implications of assessing corporate social performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 1927-1930, November.
    12. Aysin Sev, 2009. "How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development? A conceptual framework," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(3), pages 161-173.
    13. Cory Searcy, 2012. "Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 239-253, May.
    14. Frank Figge & Tobias Hahn & Stefan Schaltegger & Marcus Wagner, 2002. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(5), pages 269-284, September.
    15. Chiara Burattini & Fabio Nardecchia & Fabio Bisegna & Lucia Cellucci & Franco Gugliermetti & Andrea De Lieto Vollaro & Ferdinando Salata & Iacopo Golasi, 2015. "Methodological Approach to the Energy Analysis of Unconstrained Historical Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Cory Searcy & Daryl McCartney & Stanislav Karapetrovic, 2008. "Identifying priorities for action in corporate sustainable development indicator programs," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(2), pages 137-148, February.
    17. Idalina Dias‐Sardinha & Lucas Reijnders, 2005. "Evaluating environmental and social performance of large Portuguese companies: a balanced scorecard approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 73-91, March.
    18. Krarti, Moncef, 2015. "Evaluation of large scale building energy efficiency retrofit program in Kuwait," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1069-1080.
    19. Graham Hubbard, 2009. "Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 177-191, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chiara Mio & Antonio Costantini & Silvia Panfilo, 2022. "Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 367-384, March.
    2. Cory Searcy, 2012. "Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Systems: A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(3), pages 239-253, May.
    3. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2016. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 193-221, January.
    4. Länsiluoto, Aapo & Järvenpää, Marko, 2010. "Greening the balanced scorecard," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 385-395, July.
    5. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico & Francesco Ranalli & Riccardo Camilli, 2022. "La pianificazione della sostenibilit? nelle aziende familiari: il ruolo dei key value drivers," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(3), pages 109-134.
    6. Cory Searcy, 2016. "Measuring Enterprise Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 120-133, February.
    7. Erik G. Hansen & Martin Sextl & Ralf Reichwald, 2010. "Managing strategic alliances through a community‐enabled balanced scorecard: The case of Merck Ltd, Thailand," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(6), pages 387-399, September.
    8. Kaveh Asiaei & Nick Bontis & Omid Barani & Ruzita Jusoh, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and sustainability performance measurement systems: implications for organizational performance," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 85-126, March.
    9. Diego Pérez‐López & Ana Moreno‐Romero & Ralf Barkemeyer, 2015. "Exploring the Relationship between Sustainability Reporting and Sustainability Management Practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 720-734, December.
    10. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico & Andrea Appolloni, 2019. "Sustainability Value Creation, Survival, and Growth of the Company: A Critical Perspective in the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Stefan Schaltegger & Roger Burritt & Dimitar Zvezdov & Jacob Hörisch & Joanne Tingey-Holyoak, 2015. "Management Roles and Sustainability Information. Exploring Corporate Practice," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 25(4), pages 328-345, December.
    12. Satish Kumar & Weng Marc Lim & Riya Sureka & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Umesh Bamel, 2024. "Balanced scorecard: trends, developments, and future directions," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(8), pages 2397-2439, August.
    13. Mia Kaspersen & Thomas Riise Johansen, 2016. "Changing Social and Environmental Reporting Systems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 731-749, June.
    14. Chavatip Chindavijak & Kongkiti Phusavat & Pekka Kess & Suparerk Sooksamarn, 2016. "Transformation to Enterprise Sustainability Case Studies of Manufacturing and Service Enterprise in Thailand," Managing Innovation and Diversity in Knowledge Society Through Turbulent Time: Proceedings of the MakeLearn and TIIM Joint International Conference 2016,, ToKnowPress.
    15. Piotr Zientara & Paulina Bohdanowicz-Godfrey & Claire Whitely & Grzegorz Maciejewski, 2020. "A Case Study of LightStay (2010–2017)—Hilton’s Corporate Responsibility Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Aapo Länsiluoto & Marko Järvenpää, 2008. "Environmental and performance management forces," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(3), pages 184-206, October.
    17. Burritt, Roger & Schaltegger, Stefan, 2014. "Accounting towards sustainability in production and supply chains," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 327-343.
    18. Jau-Yang Liu, 2018. "An Internal Control System that Includes Corporate Social Responsibility for Social Sustainability in the New Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, September.
    19. Elisa Pennacchia & Mariagrazia Tiberi & Elisa Carbonara & Davide Astiaso Garcia & Fabrizio Cumo, 2016. "Reuse and Upcycling of Municipal Waste for ZEB Envelope Design in European Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, June.
    20. Ivo Hristov & Andrea Appolloni & Antonio Chirico, 2022. "The adoption of the key performance indicators to integrate sustainability in the business strategy: A novel five‐dimensional framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3216-3230, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:6:p:1968-1979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.