IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v4y1988i2p412-415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussion of “An experimental study of the effects of elicitation methods on review of preliminary audit strategy by external auditorsâ€

Author

Listed:
  • MICHAEL GIBBINS

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Gibbins, 1988. "Discussion of “An experimental study of the effects of elicitation methods on review of preliminary audit strategy by external auditorsâ€," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 412-415, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:4:y:1988:i:2:p:412-415
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1988.tb00674.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1988.tb00674.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1988.tb00674.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, Mj, 1985. "Some Evidence On The Effect Of Verbalization On Process - A Methodological Note," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 843-852.
    2. Swieringa, Rj & Weick, Ke, 1982. "An Assessment Of Laboratory Experiments In Accounting," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20, pages 56-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Brown, Andrew D., 2018. "Making sense of the war in Afghanistan," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 43-56.
    3. Petersen, Knut & Patzke, Henning, 1986. "Individuelles Informationsverhalten als Gegenstand des "Behavioral Accounting": Eine Meta-Analyse der empirischen Forschung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 177, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    4. Deborah Compeau & Barbara Marcolin & Helen Kelley & Chris Higgins, 2012. "Research Commentary ---Generalizability of Information Systems Research Using Student Subjects---A Reflection on Our Practices and Recommendations for Future Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1093-1109, December.
    5. Sandra C. Vera†Muñoz & Margaret Shackell & Marc Buehner, 2007. "Accountants' Usage of Causal Business Models in the Presence of Benchmark Data: A Note," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 1015-1038, September.
    6. William B. Tayler & Robert J. Bloomfield, 2011. "Norms, Conformity, and Controls," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 753-790, June.
    7. Chen, Yao & Djamasbi, Soussan & Du, Juan & Lim, Sungmook, 2013. "Integer-valued DEA super-efficiency based on directional distance function with an application of evaluating mood and its impact on performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 550-556.
    8. Waller, William S. & Shapiro, Brian & Sevcik, Galen, 1999. "Do cost-based pricing biases persist in laboratory markets?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(8), pages 717-739, November.
    9. Waller, William S. & Zimbelman, Mark F., 2003. "A cognitive footprint in archival data: Generalizing the dilution effect from laboratory to field settings," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 254-268, July.
    10. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 301-315, April.
    11. Maria Misiuda & Maik Lachmann, 2022. "Investors’ Perceptions of Sustainability Reporting—A Review of the Experimental Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Hurley, Patrick J., 2019. "Ego depletion and auditors’ JDM quality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Lawrence A. Ponemon, 1992. "Auditor underreporting of time and moral reasoning: An experimental lab study," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 171-189, September.
    14. J.E. Boritz & B.G. Gaber & W.M. Lemon, 1988. "An experimental study of the effects of elicitation methods on review of preliminary audit strategy by external auditors," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 392-411, March.
    15. David N. Ricchiute, 2010. "Evidence Complexity and Information Search in the Decision to Restate Prior‐Period Financial Statements," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 687-724, June.
    16. Anderson, M. J. & Potter, G. S., 1998. "On the use of regression and verbal protocol analysis in modeling analysts' behavior in an unstructured task environment: A methodological note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 435-450.
    17. Robert Obermaier & Felix Müller, 2008. "Management accounting research in the lab – method and applications," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 325-351, December.
    18. Schönfeldt, Nikki & Hancock, Phil & Birt, Jacqueline, 2020. "Consolidating the student voice using think aloud protocols," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    19. Douthit, Jeremy & Majerczyk, Michael, 2019. "Subordinate perceptions of the superior and agency costs: Theory and evidence," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Amy Verbos & Janice Miller, 2015. "When Harm is at Stake: Ethical Value Orientation, Managerial Decisions, and Relational Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 149-163, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:4:y:1988:i:2:p:412-415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.