IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v5y2009i1p1-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of parental imprisonment on child antisocial behaviour and mental health: a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Murray
  • David P. Farrington
  • Ivana Sekol
  • Rikke F. Olsen

Abstract

Parental imprisonment can cause many problems for the family left behind, including difficulty organising childcare, loss of family income, trouble maintaining contact with the imprisoned parent, stigma, and home, school and neighbourhood moves. Children and parents can be distressed by the separation. Children may respond by acting out or becoming withdrawn, anxious or depressed. We conducted an exhaustive search for studies that examined children's antisocial behaviour and mental health after parental imprisonment. This Campbell Systematic Review found 16 studies with appropriate evidence. These studies all showed that children of prisoners are more likely than other children to show antisocial and mental health problems. However, it was unclear whether parental imprisonment actually caused these problems. They might have been caused by other disadvantages in children's lives that existed before parental imprisonment occurred. More research is required to determine whether or not parental imprisonment causes an increase in child antisocial behaviour and mental health problems. Executive summary/Abstract BACKGROUND The number of children with parents in prison is increasing in many countries worldwide. Theory and qualitative research suggest that parental imprisonment might contribute to child antisocial behaviour and mental health problems, because of the trauma of separation, strained child‐care arrangements during parental imprisonment, loss of family income, other stressful life events such as moving home and school, and the stigma of parental imprisonment. OBJECTIVES The first aim of this review is to assess evidence on parental imprisonment as a predictor of child antisocial behaviour (including criminal behaviour) and poor mental health. The second aim is to assess evidence on the possible causal effects of parental imprisonment on these outcomes. A third aim is to investigate whether characteristics of children, parents, prisons, and wider social and penal settings might moderate the effects of parental imprisonment on children. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched for studies of children of prisoners by contacting experts in the field, examining the bibliographies of prior reviews, and searching electronic databases of references for the years 1960 to 2008. We searched to identify both published and unpublished literature. The searches were international in scope. Over 10,500 references were screened, 319 full text reports were retrieved, and 165 reports of studies of children of prisoners were identified. SELECTION CRITERIA Studies that compared children of prisoners with children whose parents were not imprisoned on antisocial or mental health outcomes were first identified as studies that might be eligible for the review. Studies were included in the review if the comparison group of children was either selected to represent the general population of children (to estimate the strength of prediction of child outcomes following parental imprisonment) or to be similar to children of prisoners on confounding variables (to estimate the causal effects of parental imprisonment on children). Sixteen studies were eligible for the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The results of 16 studies are described in a narrative review and in a meta‐analysis. Weighted mean effect sizes are reported for the associations between parental imprisonment and child outcomes. Moderator analyses were used to investigate possible explanations for variations in the study results. MAIN RESULTS Children of prisoners have about twice the risk of antisocial behaviour and poor mental health outcomes compared to children without imprisoned parents. All except one of the studies suggested that parental imprisonment might cause an increase in these outcomes for children (i.e., had positive effect sizes even after controlling for covariates). However, these tests of causal effects might be systematically biased because studies often did not control for prior child behaviour, parental criminality, and other important confounds associated with parental imprisonment. There were not enough studies to conduct more than exploratory analyses of moderators of the relationship between parental imprisonment and child outcomes. REVIEWERS’ CONCLUSIONS We conclude that children of prisoners are at greater risk of undesirable outcomes than their peers. However, it is not known whether parental imprisonment causes an increase in risk for children or whether other disadvantage in children's lives accounts for this association. There is increasing research interest in the possible effects of parental imprisonment on children. It is important to conduct new research that can estimate the causal effects of parental imprisonment on children more accurately, and investigate mediators and moderators of its effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Murray & David P. Farrington & Ivana Sekol & Rikke F. Olsen, 2009. "Effects of parental imprisonment on child antisocial behaviour and mental health: a systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(1), pages 1-105.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:5:y:2009:i:1:p:1-105
    DOI: 10.4073/csr.2009.4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2009.4
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4073/csr.2009.4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:pri:crcwel:wp09-20-ff is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kjellstrand, Jean & Yu, Gary & Eddy, J. Mark & Clark, Miriam & Jackson, Arriell, 2020. "The role of parental incarceration in predicting trajectories of child internalizing problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Kathryn Sharratt & Daniel Boduszek & Bernard Gallagher & Adele Jones, 2018. "Factor Structure and Factorial Invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire among Children of Prisoners and their Parents," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(2), pages 649-660, April.
    4. McLeod, Branden A. & Johnson, Waldo E. & Cryer-Coupet, Qiana R. & Mincy, Ronald B., 2019. "Examining the longitudinal effects of paternal incarceration and coparenting relationships on sons' educational outcomes: A mediation analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 362-375.
    5. Ainara Aranberri-Ruiz & Aitor Aritzeta & Amaiur Olarza & Goretti Soroa & Rosa Mindeguia, 2022. "Reducing Anxiety and Social Stress in Primary Education: A Breath-Focused Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Intervention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Kjellstrand, Jean M. & Cearley, Jennifer & Eddy, J. Mark & Foney, Dana & Martinez, Charles R., 2012. "Characteristics of incarcerated fathers and mothers: Implications for preventive interventions targeting children and families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2409-2415.
    7. Andrew Leigh, 2020. "The Second Convict Age: Explaining the Return of Mass Imprisonment in Australia," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 96(313), pages 187-208, June.
    8. Nahid Rahimipour Anaraki & Dariush Boostani, 2014. "Living in and living out: a qualitative study of incarcerated mothers’ narratives of their children’s living condition," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3093-3107, November.
    9. Theobald, Delphine & Farrington, David P. & Piquero, Alex R., 2013. "Childhood broken homes and adult violence: An analysis of moderators and mediators," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 44-52.
    10. Amanda Geller & Carey E. Cooper & Irwin Garfinkel & Ofira Schwartz-Soicher & Ronald B. Mincy, 2010. "Beyond Absenteeism: Father Incarceration and its Effects on Children's Development," Working Papers 1194, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..
    11. Tony Long & Kelly Lockwood & Nancy Loucks & Briege Nugent & Ben Raikes & Kathryn Sharratt & Louise Gallagher, 2022. "Improving Outcomes for Children Affected by Parental Involvement with the Criminal Justice System in Scotland," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(3), pages 1883-1908, June.
    12. Amanda Geller & Carey Cooper & Irwin Garfinkel & Ofira Schwartz-Soicher & Ronald Mincy, 2012. "Beyond Absenteeism: Father Incarceration and Child Development," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(1), pages 49-76, February.
    13. Anna Pękala-Wojciechowska & Andrzej Kacprzak & Krzysztof Pękala & Marta Chomczyńska & Piotr Chomczyński & Michał Marczak & Remigiusz Kozłowski & Dariusz Timler & Anna Lipert & Agnieszka Ogonowska & Pa, 2021. "Mental and Physical Health Problems as Conditions of Ex-Prisoner Re-Entry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:5:y:2009:i:1:p:1-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.