IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v3y2007i1p1-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Serious (Violent or Chronic) Juvenile Offenders: A Systematic Review of Treatment Effectiveness in Secure Corrections

Author

Listed:
  • Vicente Garrido
  • Luz Anyela Morales

Abstract

Treating serious juvenile offenders in secure corrections pays off. This Campbell Systematic Review shows that treatment programs with cognitive elements in particular reduce general recidivism (relapse into crime) and especially recidivism into serious crime. ABSTRACT Background Juveniles responsible for violent offenses are at high risk of becoming chronic offenders, committing many types of offenses. A challenge in the treatment of the these violent or chronic delinquents is that the majority are well into the delinquent careers. It remains to be demonstrated what specific strategies provided within secure correctional facilities are promising in rehabilitating incarcerated these serious juvenile offenders. Objectives To systematically collect and assess the quality of the outcomes of empirical research regarding the effectiveness of treatment programmes implemented in secure corrections designed to decrease the reoffending rate and type of offense for serious (chronic or violent) delinquents (12‐21 years old). Search Strategy Several strategies were used to identify studies that met the explicit criteria of this review. We conducted a specific search in 14 relevant electronic databases about the topic area, including the Campbell SPECTR database of trials. Experts in the field were consulted and relevant citations were followed up. Selection Criteria This review included experimental (with random assignment) and quasi‐experimental (without random assignment) studies with control or comparison groups. Furthermore, the outcomes presented in the studies include recidivism rates or at least information about new offenses. The program recipients were juveniles either male or female, in secure corrections aged between 12 and 21 years old, under either the adult or juvenile jurisdictions, characterised as serious (chronic or violent) delinquents. Data collection and analysis Separate meta‐analyses were carried out for the two different recidivism measures (general and serious recidivism) and for completers and intent‐to‐treat (as assigned) data. We selected as the effect‐size index the odds ratio and its translation to natural logarithm. The meta‐analytic calculations were carried out assuming a random‐effects model. When the heterogeneity Q test was statistically significant, mixed‐effects analyses were carried out to search for moderator variables that could explain the variability among the effect estimates. For qualitative moderator variables, weighted analyses of variance were applied on the effect estimates, whereas the relationship between continuous moderator variables and the effect estimates was assessed by weighted regression models. Main Results The overall results at the last follow up for completers showed a statistically significant positive result in favour of treatment. For the intent‐to‐treat data, both fixed‐ and random‐effects models were statistically significant. This result showed that even under the more conservative intent‐to‐treat model, the interventions were still effective overall. Moderator variables did not show a statistically significant results to explain the heterogeneity in relation to effectiveness of the treatment. We found evidence for positive effects of the cognitive and cognitive‐behavioural treatments and of the multi‐focus programmes. Reviewers’ conclusions In general, the programmes “do work” to reduce the general and, specially, the serious recidivism of serious institutionalised juvenile offenders. This is particularly true in the case of interventions with a cognitive or cognitive‐behavioural emphasis, applied to male samples in centres of juvenile reform. It seems also that the educative non‐structured programs did not work to reduce the recidivism. This review should be cited as: Garrido, V. and Morales, L.A. (2007). Serious (violent and chronic) juvenile offenders: a Systematic Review of treatment effectiveness in secure corrections. In: The Campbell Collaboration Reviews of Intervention and Policy Evaluations (C2‐RIPE), July 2007. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Campbell Collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicente Garrido & Luz Anyela Morales, 2007. "Serious (Violent or Chronic) Juvenile Offenders: A Systematic Review of Treatment Effectiveness in Secure Corrections," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), pages 1-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:3:y:2007:i:1:p:1-46
    DOI: 10.4073/csr.2007.7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2007.7
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4073/csr.2007.7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Chioda, 2017. "Stop the Violence in Latin America," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 25920.
    2. Mallett, Christopher A., 2013. "Juvenile life without the possibility of parole: Constitutional but complicated," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 743-752.
    3. Whitten, Tyson & Cale, Jesse & Nathan, Sally & Williams, Megan & Baldry, Eileen & Ferry, Mark & Hayen, Andrew, 2023. "Influence of a residential drug and alcohol program on young people's criminal conviction trajectories," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Souverein, F.A. & Van der Helm, G.H.P. & Stams, G.J.J.M., 2013. "‘Nothing works’ in secure residential youth care?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1941-1945.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:3:y:2007:i:1:p:1-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.