IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v20y2024i2ne1404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of aftercare/resettlement services on crime and violence in children and youth: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer S. Wong
  • Chelsey Lee
  • Natalie Beck

Abstract

Background High rates of youth re‐offending indicate that young custody‐leavers face challenges when reintegrating into their communities. Aftercare and resettlement programs can occur pre‐, during, and post‐release and generally provide multiple forms of support services to address youths' transitional needs. Objectives The present review examines (1) the impact of youth aftercare/resettlement programs on crime‐related outcomes, (2) how treatment effect is moderated by participant, program, and study characteristics, (3) whether some types of interventions are more effective than others, (4) barriers/facilitators to effective program implementation, (5) the theory of change underlying resettlement interventions, and (6) available research on intervention cost. Search Methods A comprehensive set of keywords and synonyms was combined in a Boolean search across 26 electronic databases. Multiple gray literature sources were also searched, including 23 journals, 4 meeting archives, 11 organization websites, 3 open access journal websites, and the CVs of 8 well‐known researchers in the field. The search was completed in January 2023. Selection Criteria For objectives 1–3, studies were included if they utilized a randomized controlled design or quasi‐experimental comparison group design in which participants were matched on at least some baseline variables and included at least one quantitative individual‐measure of crime. For objective 4, included studies presented process evaluations of aftercare/reentry programs, clearly stated their research goals, and used qualitative methods in an appropriate way to answer the stated research question. For objectives 5 and 6, no specific methods were required; any study meeting the criteria for objectives 1–4 which presented findings on theory of change or cost data were included. For all outcomes, only studies conducted in a westernized country, and published after 1991 in English, French, or German were considered. Data Collection and Analysis Two coders conducted primary data extraction for the included studies. Data were entered into a Microsoft Excel database. After data extraction, the two coders validated the coding by cross‐checking the database with each research report. Discrepancies between coders were discussed until consensus was reached. Where consensus could not be reached, a third coder was consulted. Study risk of bias was addressed using the ROBINS‐I (Sterne et al., 2016), ROB‐2 (Higgins et al., 2019), and the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP, 2018). Objectives 1–3 were addressed by synthesizing quantitative outcomes from rigorous impact evaluations of aftercare interventions using random effects models and meta‐regression. Thematic and narrative analysis was conducted to address objectives 4–6. Results The search resulted in 15 impact studies, representing 4,718 participants across 21 program sites, and 35 effect sizes. The 21 impact evaluations were rated as having either low/moderate bias (k = 11) or serious bias (k = 10). The synthesis of 15 impact studies found no significant effects for arrest (k = 14; OR = 1.044, 95% prediction interval [0.527, 2.075], t = 0.335) or incarceration (k = 8, OR = 0.806, 95% prediction interval [2.203, 1.433], t = −1.674). A significant pooled effect was found for conviction (k = 13, OR = 1.209, 95% prediction interval [1.000, 1.462], t = 2.256), but results were highly sensitive to the inclusion of specific studies. No meaningful pattern of results emerged in moderator analyses with respect to study, sample, program component, or program delivery characteristics. The 19 process studies were rated as either high quality (k = 12) or moderate quality (k = 7). Thematic synthesis of the process evaluations revealed 15 themes related to the strengths/challenges of program implementation. The assessment of program cost (k = 7) determined a lack of data within the literature, preventing any summative analysis. Authors' Conclusions Current evidence is promising with respect to conviction outcomes but overall does not find that aftercare/resettlement interventions have a reliably positive impact on crime‐related outcomes for young people who have offended. High variability across outcomes and reported data resulted in small sample sizes per outcome and limited moderator analyses. Multiple challenges for program implementation exist; additional rigorous research is sorely needed to further investigate the nuances of the program effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer S. Wong & Chelsey Lee & Natalie Beck, 2024. "The effects of aftercare/resettlement services on crime and violence in children and youth: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:20:y:2024:i:2:n:e1404
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1404
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer S. Wong & Chelsey Lee & Natalie Beck, 2023. "PROTOCOL: The effects of resettlement/re‐entry services on crime and violence in children and youth: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), March.
    2. Abrams, Laura S. & Shannon, Sarah K.S. & Sangalang, Cindy, 2008. "Transition services for incarcerated youth: A mixed methods evaluation study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 522-535, May.
    3. Maria Cary & Stephen Butler & Geoffrey Baruch & Nicole Hickey & Sarah Byford, 2013. "Economic Evaluation of Multisystemic Therapy for Young People at Risk for Continuing Criminal Activity in the UK," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-6, April.
    4. Aalsma, M.C. & White, L.M. & Lau, K.S.L. & Perkins, A. & Monahan, P. & Grisso, T., 2015. "Behavioral health care needs, detention-based care, and criminal recidivism at community reentry from Juvenile detention: A multisite survival curve analysis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(7), pages 1372-1378.
    5. Kubek, Julia Behen & Tindall-Biggins, Carly & Reed, Kelsie & Carr, Lauren E. & Fenning, Pamela A., 2020. "A systematic literature review of school reentry practices among youth impacted by juvenile justice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    6. Aurelio Tobias, 1999. "Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-anyalysis estimate," Stata Technical Bulletin, StataCorp LP, vol. 8(47).
    7. Howard White, 2018. "Theory-based systematic reviews," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 17-38, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer S. Wong & Chelsey Lee & Natalie Beck, 2023. "PROTOCOL: The effects of resettlement/re‐entry services on crime and violence in children and youth: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), March.
    2. Fanjie Meng & Xiangpo Pan & Wenzhen Tong, 2018. "Rifampicin versus streptomycin for brucellosis treatment in humans: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Meiyun Wang & Xiubo Jiang & Wenlong Wu & Dongfeng Zhang, 2013. "Endothelial NO Synthase Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Ischemic Stroke in Asian Population: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, March.
    4. Doris S M Chan & Rosa Lau & Dagfinn Aune & Rui Vieira & Darren C Greenwood & Ellen Kampman & Teresa Norat, 2011. "Red and Processed Meat and Colorectal Cancer Incidence: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-11, June.
    5. Otsu, Yuki & Yuen, C.Y. Kelvin, 2022. "Health, crime, and the labor market: Theory and policy analysis," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Suchi Kapoor Malhotra & Marcella Vigneri & Nina Ashley O. Dela Cruz & Heather MacDonald & Howard White, 2023. "PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of economic development interventions in humanitarian settings in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A mixed‐method systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    7. Bijing Mao & Yafei Li & Zhimin Zhang & Chuan Chen & Yuanyuan Chen & Chenchen Ding & Lin Lei & Jian Li & Mei Jiang & Dong Wang & Ge Wang, 2015. "One-Carbon Metabolic Factors and Risk of Renal Cell Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, October.
    8. Julia H. Littell & Therese D. Pigott & Karianne H. Nilsen & Stacy J. Green & Olga L. K. Montgomery, 2021. "Multisystemic Therapy® for social, emotional, and behavioural problems in youth age 10 to 17: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.
    9. Abrams, Laura S. & Snyder, Susan M., 2010. "Youth offender reentry: Models for intervention and directions for future inquiry," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 1787-1795, December.
    10. Edoardo Masset & Suchi Kapoor Malhotra & Neha Gupta & Ratika Bhandari & Howard White & Heather MacDonald & Ranjitha Puskur & Niyati Singaraju & Hugh Sharma Waddington, 2023. "PROTOCOL: The impact of agricultural mechanisation on women's economic empowerment: A mixed‐methods systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    11. Kim, Bo-Kyung Elizabeth & Quinn, Camille R. & Logan-Greene, Patricia & DiClemente, Ralph & Voisin, Dexter, 2020. "A longitudinal examination of African American adolescent females detained for status offense," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Qian Chen & Rongliang Shi & Weiyan Liu & Daowen Jiang, 2013. "Assessing Interactions between the Association of Common Genetic Variant at 1p11 (rs11249433) and Hormone Receptor Status with Breast Cancer Risk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-7, August.
    13. Suchi Kapoor Malhotra & Ashrita Saran & Sabina Singh & Swati Mantri & Neha Gupta & Ratika Bhandari & Howard White & Ranjitha Puskur & Sarah Young & Hugh Waddington & Edoardo Masset, 2023. "PROTOCOL: Value chain interventions for improving women's economic empowerment: A mixed‐method systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), September.
    14. Libing Wang & Fan Yin & Xia Xu & Xiaoxia Hu & Dongbao Zhao, 2012. "X-Ray Repair Cross-Complementing Group 1 (XRCC1) Genetic Polymorphisms and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-6, April.
    15. Suchi Kapoor Malhotra & Swati Mantri & Neha Gupta & Ratika Bhandari & Ralph Nii Armah & Hamdiyah Alhassan & Sarah Young & Howard White & Ranjitha Puskur & Hugh Sharma Waddington & Edoardo Masset, 2024. "Value chain interventions for improving women's economic empowerment: A mixed‐methods systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), September.
    16. Li-Yuan Liu & Meng Wang & Zhong-Bing Ma & Li-Xiang Yu & Qiang Zhang & De-Zong Gao & Fei Wang & Zhi-Gang Yu, 2013. "The Role of Adiponectin in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-1, August.
    17. Haolin Wang & Wendy Y. Huang & Yanan Zhao, 2022. "Efficacy of Exercise on Muscle Function and Physical Performance in Older Adults with Sarcopenia: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, July.
    18. Applegarth, D. Michael & Adams, Benjamin, 2023. "Screening, service provision, and information sharing practices of juvenile facilities," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    19. Bin Su & Tiansheng Liu & Haojun Fan & Feng Chen & Hui Ding & Zhouwei Wu & Hongwu Wang & Shike Hou, 2016. "Inflammatory Markers and the Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Woodgate, Roberta L. & Morakinyo, Oluwatobiloba & Martin, Katrina M., 2017. "Interventions for youth aging out of care: A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 280-300.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:20:y:2024:i:2:n:e1404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.