IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v19y2023i2ne1332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PROTOCOL: Assessment of outcome reporting bias in studies included in Campbell systematic reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Julia H. Littell
  • Dennis M. Gorman
  • Jeffrey C. Valentine
  • Therese D. Pigott

Abstract

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: To identify methods used to assess the risk of outcome reporting bias (ORB) in studies included in recent Campbell systematic reviews of intervention effects. The review will answer the following questions: What proportion of recent Campbell reviews included assessment of ORB? How did recent reviews define levels of risk of ORB (what categories, labels, and definitions did they use)? To what extent and how did these reviews use study protocols as sources of data on ORB? To what extent and how did reviews document reasons for judgments about risk of ORB? To what extent and how did reviews assess the inter‐rater reliability of ORB ratings? To what extent and how were issues of ORB considered in the review's abstract, plain language summary, and conclusions?

Suggested Citation

  • Julia H. Littell & Dennis M. Gorman & Jeffrey C. Valentine & Therese D. Pigott, 2023. "PROTOCOL: Assessment of outcome reporting bias in studies included in Campbell systematic reviews," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:19:y:2023:i:2:n:e1332
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1332
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey C. Valentine & Therese D. Pigott & Hannah R. Rothstein, 2010. "How Many Studies Do You Need?," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(2), pages 215-247, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Habarurema Jean Baptiste & Yan Guang Cai & A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam & Nzabalirwa Wenceslas, 2022. "A Systematic Review of University Social Responsibility in Post-Conflict Societies: The Case of the Great Lakes Region of East Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 439-475, November.
    2. Yunjeong Yi & Eunju Seo & Jiyeon An, 2022. "Does Forest Therapy Have Physio-Psychological Benefits? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Chuang Yuan & Jing Wang & Michael Ying, 2016. "Predictive Value of Carotid Distensibility Coefficient for Cardiovascular Diseases and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Germano Glufke Reis & Carla Forte Maiolino Molento, 2020. "Emerging Market Multinationals and International Corporate Social Responsibility Standards: Bringing Animals to the Fore," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 351-368, October.
    5. Valérie Benoit & Piera Gabola, 2021. "Effects of Positive Psychology Interventions on the Well-Being of Young Children: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Monica Jain & Shannon Shisler & Charlotte Lane & Avantika Bagai & Elizabeth Brown & Mark Engelbert & Yoav Vardy & John Eyers & Daniela Anda Leon & Shradha S. Parsekar, 2022. "Use of community engagement interventions to improve child immunisation in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.
    7. Sandra Feijóo & Raquel Rodríguez-Fernández, 2021. "A Meta-Analytical Review of Gender-Based School Bullying in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Oesterreich, Thuy Duong & Anton, Eduard & Teuteberg, Frank & Dwivedi, Yogesh K, 2022. "The role of the social and technical factors in creating business value from big data analytics: A meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 128-149.
    9. Mikkel Helding Vembye & James Eric Pustejovsky & Therese Deocampo Pigott, 2023. "Power Approximations for Overall Average Effects in Meta-Analysis With Dependent Effect Sizes," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(1), pages 70-102, February.
    10. Sarah Fischer & Shannon Hyder & Arlene Walker, 2020. "The effect of employee affective and cognitive trust in leadership on organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitment: Meta-analytic findings and implications for trust research," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(4), pages 662-679, November.
    11. Olesya Falenchuk & Michal Perlman & Evelyn McMullen & Brooke Fletcher & Prakesh S Shah, 2017. "Education of staff in preschool aged classrooms in child care centers and child outcomes: A meta-analysis and systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-33, August.
    12. Markus Hang & Jerome Geyer‐Klingeberg & Andreas Rathgeber & Stefan Stöckl, 2018. "Economic Development Matters: A Meta‐Regression Analysis on the Relation between Environmental Management and Financial Performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 720-744, August.
    13. Sonia Nath & Sneha Sethi & João L. Bastos & Helena M. Constante & Kostas Kapellas & Dandara Haag & Lisa M. Jamieson, 2022. "A Global Perspective of Racial–Ethnic Inequities in Dental Caries: Protocol of Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Carmen Rodríguez-Jiménez & Juan-Carlos de la Cruz-Campos & María-Natalia Campos-Soto & Magdalena Ramos-Navas-Parejo, 2023. "Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Primary Education: The Role of ICT-A Systematic Review of the Literature," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, January.
    15. Barreiro-Hurle, Jesus & Espinosa-Goded, Maria & Martinez-Paz, Jose Miguel & Perni, Angel, 2018. "Choosing not to choose: A meta-analysis of status quo effects in environmental valuations using choice experiments," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 18(01), June.
    16. Chunxiao Li & Yuxin Zhu & Mengge Zhang & Henrik Gustafsson & Tao Chen, 2019. "Mindfulness and Athlete Burnout: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Katsonga-Phiri, Tiamo & Lewis, Jarrett T. & Murray, Maxwell & DuBois, David L. & Grant, Kathryn E., 2021. "Mental health interventions for African children: A meta-analytic review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. Falonn Contreras-Osorio & Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo & Enrique Cerda-Vega & Rodrigo Campos-Jara & Cristian Martínez-Salazar & Rodrigo Araneda & Daniela Ebner-Karestinos & Cristián Arellano-Roco & Christ, 2022. "Effects of Sport-Based Exercise Interventions on Executive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Pablo Valdés-Badilla & Tomás Herrera-Valenzuela & Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo & Esteban Aedo-Muñoz & Eduardo Báez-San Martín & Alex Ojeda-Aravena & Braulio Henrique Magnani Branco, 2021. "Effects of Olympic Combat Sports on Older Adults’ Health Status: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Tong, Ruipeng & Yang, Xiaoyi & Li, Hongwei & Li, Jianfei, 2019. "Dual process management of coal miners’ unsafe behaviour in the Chinese context: Evidence from a meta-analysis and inspired by the JD-R model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 205-217.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:19:y:2023:i:2:n:e1332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.