IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v16y2020i2ne1089.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Problem‐oriented policing for reducing crime and disorder: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua C. Hinkle
  • David Weisburd
  • Cody W. Telep
  • Kevin Petersen

Abstract

Background Herman Goldstein developed problem‐oriented policing (POP) to focus police on more proactively addressing chronic problems, rather than using traditional reactive efforts. POP has been utilized to target a wide range of problems and has become commonly used in agencies across the United States and the world, although implementation is often uneven. POP interventions commonly use the SARA (scanning, analysis, response, assessment) model to identify problems, carefully analyze the conditions contributing to the problem, develop a tailored response to target these underlying factors, and evaluate outcome effectiveness. Objectives To extend and update the findings of the original POP systematic review by synthesizing the findings of published and unpublished evaluations of POP through December 2018 to assess its overall impacts on crime and disorder. The review also examined impacts of POP on crime displacement, police financial costs, and noncrime outcomes. Search Methods Searches using POP keywords of the Global Policing Database at the University of Queensland were conducted to identify published and unpublished evaluations between 2006 and 2018. We supplemented these searches with forward searches, hand searches of leading journals and the Center for Problem‐Oriented Policing, and consultation with experts. Selection Criteria Eligible studies had to include a target area or group that received a POP intervention AND a control area/group that received standard police services. The control condition could be either experimental or quasi‐experimental. Units of analysis could be places or people. We defined POP as studies that generally followed the tenets of the SARA model. Data Collection and Analysis We identified 39 new (published between 2006 and 2018) studies that met our eligibility criteria as an evaluation of POP. Twenty‐four of these studies had sufficient data available to calculate an effect size. Along with the 10 studies from our initial systematic review of POP, these 34 studies are included in our meta‐analytic review of POP. Nine of these studies were randomized experiments and 25 were quasi‐experiments. We calculated effect sizes for each study using Cohen's D and relative incidence risk ratios and used random effects meta‐analyses to synthesize studies. Results Our meta‐analyses suggest statistically significant impacts of POP. Our relative incident risk ratio analysis of mean effects suggests a 33.8% reduction in crime/disorder in the POP treatment areas/groups relative to the controls. We find no evidence of significant crime displacement as a result of POP and some evidence for a greater likelihood of a diffusion of crime control benefits. Few studies assessed noncrime outcomes, but our narrative review suggests POP is cost‐effective, but has limited impacts on fear of crime, legitimacy, and collective efficacy. Authors’ Conclusions Our review provides strong and consistent evidence that POP is an effective strategy for reducing crime and disorder. There is a great deal of heterogeneity in the magnitude of effect sizes across factors such as study type, study rigor and crime type. Despite this heterogeneity, 31 out of 34 studies (91.2%) have effect sizes in favor of a treatment effect and the overall mean effect is positive and significant in all of our models.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua C. Hinkle & David Weisburd & Cody W. Telep & Kevin Petersen, 2020. "Problem‐oriented policing for reducing crime and disorder: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:16:y:2020:i:2:n:e1089
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1089
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Braga, Anthony A., 2008. "Pulling levers focused deterrence strategies and the prevention of gun homicide," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 332-343, August.
    2. Mazerolle, Lorraine & McBroom, James & Rombouts, Sacha, 2011. "Compstat in Australia: An analysis of the spatial and temporal impact," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 128-136.
    3. Anthony A. Braga & David Weisburd & Brandon Turchan, 2019. "Focused deterrence strategies effects on crime: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), September.
    4. Anthony A. Braga, 2007. "Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), pages 1-36.
    5. Anthony A. Braga & Brandon Turchan & Andrew V. Papachristos & David M. Hureau, 2019. "Hot spots policing of small geographic areas effects on crime," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), September.
    6. Kate Bowers & Shane Johnson & Rob T. Guerette & Lucia Summers & Suzanne Poynton, 2011. "Spatial Displacement And Diffusion Of Benefits Among Geographically Focused Policing Initiatives," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 1-144.
    7. David Weisburd & Cody W. Telep & Joshua C. Hinkle & John E. Eck, 2008. "The Effects of Problem‐Oriented Policing on Crime and Disorder," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 1-87.
    8. Mazerolle, Lorraine & McBroom, James & Rombouts, Sacha, 2011. "Compstat in Australia: An analysis of the spatial and temporal impact," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 128-136, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nielson, Kyler R. & Zhang, Yan & Ingram, Jason R., 2022. "The impact of COVID-19 on police officer activities," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Trood, Michael D. & Spivak, Benjamin L. & Ogloff, James R.P., 2021. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of judicial supervision on recidivism and well-being factors of criminal offenders," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Lorraine Mazerolle & Peter Neyroud, 2020. "Editorial: The Campbell Crime & Justice Coordinating Group: Celebrating 20 years of achievements," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), June.
    4. Spencer, M. Dylan & Schnell, Cory, 2022. "Reinvestigating the relationship between cities and the spatial distribution of robbery: A tale of eight cities," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naci Akdemir & Serkan Yenal, 2021. "How Phishers Exploit the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Content Analysis of COVID-19 Themed Phishing Emails," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    2. repec:wly:camsys:v:7:y:2011:i:1:p:1-38:a is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Sorg, Evan T. & Taylor, Ralph B., 2011. "Community-level impacts of temperature on urban street robbery," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 463-470.
    4. Anthony A. Braga & Brandon C. Welsh, 2016. "PROTOCOL: Broken Windows Policing to Reduce Crime: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31.
    5. Laura Jaitman, 2019. "Frontiers in the economics of crime: lessons for Latin America and the Caribbean," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-36, December.
    6. Guangquan Li & Robert Haining & Sylvia Richardson & Nicky Best, 2013. "Evaluating the No Cold Calling Zones in Peterborough, England: Application of a Novel Statistical Method for Evaluating Neighbourhood Policing Policies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(8), pages 2012-2026, August.
    7. Kate Bowers & Shane Johnson & Rob T. Guerette & Lucia Summers & Suzanne Poynton, 2011. "Spatial Displacement And Diffusion Of Benefits Among Geographically Focused Policing Initiatives," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 1-144.
    8. Jason Corburn & DeVone Boggan & Khaalid Muttaqi & Sam Vaughn & James Houston & Julius Thibodeaux & Brian Muhammad, 2021. "A healing-centered approach to preventing urban gun violence: The Advance Peace Model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, December.
    9. Carter, Travis M. & Wolfe, Scott E., 2021. "Explaining the relationship between neighborhood disorder and crime fear: The perceptual role of neighbors and the police," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. James Alm & Trey Dronyk‐Trosper & Sean Larkin, 2024. "Do opportunity zones create opportunities? The impact of opportunity zones on real estate prices," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 52(1), pages 214-238, January.
    11. Alonso, José M. & Andrews, Rhys & Jorda, Vanesa, 2019. "Do neighbourhood renewal programs reduce crime rates? Evidence from England," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 51-69.
    12. Kevin Petersen & Robert C. Davis & David Weisburd & Bruce Taylor, 2022. "Effects of second responder programs on repeat incidents of family abuse: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    13. Kang, Songman & Kim, Duol, 2022. "Focus vs. spread: Police box consolidation and its impact on crime in Korea," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Cody W. Telep & David Weisburd & Sean Wire & David Farrington, 2016. "PROTOCOL: Increased Police Patrol Presence Effects on Crime and Disorder," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35.
    15. Katja Lindskov Jacobsen, 2019. "Poly‐criminal Pirates and Ballooning Effects: Implications for International Counter‐piracy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(1), pages 52-59, February.
    16. Mirzaoglu, Gulbike, 2023. "Essays in economics of crime prevention and behavior under uncertainty," Other publications TiSEM 2365661f-9f4d-4511-ad2f-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Yuchen Luo & Bruce Golden & Rui Zhang, 2023. "The Hot Spot Coverage Patrol Problem: Formulations and Solution Approaches," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 1286-1307, November.
    18. Daniel Mejía & Ervyn Norza & Santiago Tobón & Martín Vanegas-Arias, 2022. "Broken windows policing and crime: Evidence from 80 Colombian cities," Chapters, in: Paolo Buonanno & Paolo Vanin & Juan Vargas (ed.), A Modern Guide to the Economics of Crime, chapter 4, pages 55-87, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. David Weisburd & Cody W. Telep & Joshua C. Hinkle & John E. Eck, 2008. "The Effects of Problem‐Oriented Policing on Crime and Disorder," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 1-87.
    20. David Weisburd & Kevin Petersen & Taryn Zastrow & Robert Davis & Lorraine Mazerolle & Elizabeth Eggins, 2021. "PROTOCOL: Police stops to reduce crime: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), June.
    21. Castillo-Manzano, José I. & Castro-Nuño, Mercedes & Lopez-Valpuesta, Lourdes, 2024. "Planning traffic surveillance in Spain: How to optimize the management of police resources to reduce road fatalities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:16:y:2020:i:2:n:e1089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.