IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/amposc/v63y2019i3p660-674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Diversity Works: The Effects of Coalition Composition on the Success of Lobbying Coalitions

Author

Listed:
  • Wiebke Marie Junk

Abstract

Lobbyists frequently join forces to influence policy, yet the success of active lobbying coalitions remains a blind spot in the literature. This article is the first to test how and when characteristics of active coalitions increase their lobbying success. Based on pluralist theory, one can expect diverse coalitions, uniting different societal interests, to signal broad support to policy makers. Yet, their responsiveness to this signal (i.e., signaling benefits) and contribution incentives within the coalition (i.e., cooperation costs) are likely to vary with issue salience. This theory is tested on a unique data set comprising 50 issues in five European countries. Results reveal a strong moderating effect of salience on the relationship between coalition diversity and success: On less salient issues, homogenous coalitions are more likely to succeed, whereas the effect reverses with higher salience, where diverse coalitions are more successful. These findings have implications for understanding political responsiveness and potential policy capture.

Suggested Citation

  • Wiebke Marie Junk, 2019. "When Diversity Works: The Effects of Coalition Composition on the Success of Lobbying Coalitions," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(3), pages 660-674, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:63:y:2019:i:3:p:660-674
    DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12437
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajps.12437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schulz, Nicolai, 2020. "The politics of export restrictions: A panel data analysis of African commodity processing industries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    2. Naghmeh Nasiritousi & Alexandra Buylova & Mathias Fridahl & Gunilla Reischl, 2024. "Making the UNFCCC fit for purpose: A research agenda on vested interests and green spiralling," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 487-494, May.
    3. Timo Seidl, 2022. "The politics of platform capitalism: A case study on the regulation of Uber in New York," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 357-374, April.
    4. Adrià Albareda & Caelesta Braun & Bert Fraussen, 2023. "Explaining why public officials perceive interest groups as influential: on the role of policy capacities and policy insiderness," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 191-209, June.
    5. Mintao Nie, 2023. "IOs’ selective adoption of NGO information: Evidence from the Universal Periodic Review," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 27-59, January.
    6. Benjamin C. K. Egerod & Wiebke Marie Junk, 2022. "Competitive lobbying in the influence production process and the use of spatial econometrics in lobbying research," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 193-215, April.
    7. Wei-Fong Pan, 2023. "Does a firm’s lobbying activity respond to its peers’ lobbying activity?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 297-324, March.
    8. R. L. N. Murthy & Hardeep Singh Mundi, 2023. "Stock Return Synchronicity and Profitability: Evidence from India," Paradigm, , vol. 27(1), pages 47-59, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:amposc:v:63:y:2019:i:3:p:660-674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5907 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.