IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v7y1991i6p585-595.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of relative price perceptions and demographic factors on restaurant catfish consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Danilo C. Israel

    (Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Clemson University)

  • Kandice H. Kahl

    (Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Clemson University)

  • Robert S. Pomeroy

    (Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Clemson University)

Abstract

Using dichotomous logit analysis, the study measures the effects of relative price perceptions and demographic factors on the probability of restaurant catfish consumption in the United States. The study uses data from the 1988 Southern Regional Aquaculture Center Consumer Survey. Relative price perceptions, income, race, religion, urbanization, and region are found to be significant determinants of the probability of restaurant catfish consumption. The probability of consumption is higher among consumers in urban areas and the Central regions and lower among low income consumers, Hispanics, Catholics, and consumers in the New England and Mid-Atlantic regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Danilo C. Israel & Kandice H. Kahl & Robert S. Pomeroy, 1991. "The effects of relative price perceptions and demographic factors on restaurant catfish consumption," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(6), pages 585-595.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:7:y:1991:i:6:p:585-595
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(199111)7:6<585::AID-AGR2720070608>3.0.CO;2-P
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amemiya, Takeshi, 1981. "Qualitative Response Models: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1483-1536, December.
    2. Oral Capps & Randall A. Kramer, 1985. "Analysis of Food Stamp Participation Using Qualitative Choice Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(1), pages 49-59.
    3. Lynn E. Dellenbarger & E. Jane Luzar & Alvin R. Schupp, 1988. "Household demand for catfish in Louisiana," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(5), pages 493-501.
    4. Oral Capps & Daniel S. Moen & Robert E. Branson, 1988. "Consumer characteristics associated with the selection of lean meat products," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(6), pages 549-557.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Capps, Oral, 1995. "Factors Affecting the Probability of Consuming Fish and Shellfish in the Away from Home and at Home Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 161-171, July.
    2. Herrmann, Robert O. & Rauniyar, Ganesh P. & Hanson, Gregory D. & Wang, Guoquing, 1994. "Identifying Frequent Seafood Purchasers In The Northeastern U.S," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-10, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pingetzer, Robert L. & Menkhaus, Dale J. & Whipple, Glen D. & Field, Ray A., 1989. "The Influence of Selected Product and Demographic Characteristics on Beef Purchasing Patterns," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 245042, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Young, Katherine D. & Shumway, C. Richard, 1991. "Cow-Calf Producers' Perceived Profit Maximization Objective: A Logit Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 129-136, July.
    3. Boisvert, Richard N. & Bills, Nelson L. & Bailey, Elizabeth, 1988. "A Model To Explain Participation In New York'S Agricultural Districts And Use-Value Assessment Programs," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Goodwin, Barry K. & Koudele, Joe W., 1990. "An Analysis Of Consumer Characteristics Associated With The Purchase Of Beef And Pork Variety Meats," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-8, July.
    5. Garcia, Philip & Hudson, Michael A. & Waller, Mark L., 1988. "The Pricing Efficiency Of Agricultural Futures Markets: An Analysis Of Previous Research Results," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Larry D. Makus & Biing-Hwan Lin & John Carlson & Rose Krebill-Prather, 1990. "Factors influencing farm level use of futures and options in commodity marketing," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(6), pages 621-631.
    7. Makus, Larry D. & Guenthner, Joseph F. & Lin, Biing-Hwan, 1992. "Factors Influencing Producer Support For A State Mandatory Seed Law: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-8, December.
    8. Makus, Larry D. & Lin, Biing-Hwan & Carlson, John & Krebill-Prather, Rose, 1990. "Factors Influencing Producer Decisions On The Use Of Futures And Options In Commodity Marketing," A.E. Research Series 305069, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    9. BATTESE, GEORGEE. & Ahmad, Munir, 1997. "A pro bit analysis of the incidence of the cotton leaf curl virus in Punjab, Pakistan," MPRA Paper 37706, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Franco, Mary Ann P. & Riethmuller, Paul C. & Brown, Colin G., 1995. "Probit Model of the Factors Affecting the Adoption of Artificial Insemination in the Breeding of Beef Cattle in the Phillippines," 1995 Conference (39th), February 14-16, 1995, Perth, Australia 149094, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    11. Lee, David R. & Boisvert, Richard N., 1985. "Factors Affecting Participation In The Milk Diversion Program In The U.S. And New York," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-10, October.
    12. Tanvir Ahmed & Bashir Ahmad, 2014. "Burning of Crop Residue and its Potential for Electricity Generation," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 275-292.
    13. Paleti, Rajesh, 2018. "Generalized multinomial probit Model: Accommodating constrained random parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 248-262.
    14. Maria Iacovou, 2002. "Class Size in the Early Years: Is Smaller Really Better?," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 261-290.
    15. Erik Stam & Roy Thurik & Peter van der Zwan, 2010. "Entrepreneurial exit in real and imagined markets," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(4), pages 1109-1139, August.
    16. Sarah Ann Wheeler & Céline Nauges & Alec Zuo, 2021. "How stable are Australian farmers’ climate change risk perceptions? New evidence of the feedback loop between risk perceptions and behaviour," Post-Print hal-04670841, HAL.
    17. Haoying Wang & Guohui Wu, 2022. "Modeling discrete choices with large fine-scale spatial data: opportunities and challenges," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 325-351, July.
    18. Y. Saks, 2016. "Socio-economic transitions on the labour market : a European benchmarking exercise," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue iii, pages 41-58, December.
    19. Haaijer, Marinus E., 1996. "Predictions in conjoint choice experiments : the x-factor probit model," Research Report 96B22, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    20. Ashok Mishra & Barry Goodwin, 2006. "Revenue insurance purchase decisions of farmers," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 149-159.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:7:y:1991:i:6:p:585-595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.