IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v5y1989i1p25-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market power or relative efficiency? an examination of profitability performance in the Canadian food and beverage sector

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Hazledine

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of British Columbia at Vancouver)

Abstract

The article uses data on all the firms in sixteen Canadian food and beverage manufacturing industries to examine intra-industry profitability differences. The skewedness of profit performance within industries is informative for the debate on whether interindustry profitability differences in price-raising market power or in the incidence of unusually efficient firms in an industry. It is found that six of the industries appear to be quite competitive and that eight have some form of market power, usually accompanied, however, by efficiency differences as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Hazledine, 1989. "Market power or relative efficiency? an examination of profitability performance in the Canadian food and beverage sector," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(1), pages 25-42.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:5:y:1989:i:1:p:25-42
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(198901)5:1<25::AID-AGR2720050104>3.0.CO;2-W
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Caves & M. E. Porter, 1977. "From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 91(2), pages 241-261.
    2. Richard Schmalensee, 1978. "Entry Deterrence in the Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereal Industry," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 9(2), pages 305-327, Autumn.
    3. Ravenscraft, David J, 1983. "Structure-Profit Relationships at the Line of Business and Industry Level," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 65(1), pages 22-31, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McKee, Gregory J. & Shaik, Saleem & Boland, Michael A., 2009. "Role of Financial Variables in Explaining the Profitability of North Dakota Farm Supply and Grain Marketing Cooperatives," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 37(2), pages 1-12.
    2. Sarker, Rakhal & Ratnesena, Shashini, 2014. "Revealed Comparative Advantage and Half-A-Century Competitiveness of Canadian Agriculture: A Case Study of Wheat, Beef and Pork Sectors," Working Papers 165675, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    3. Roopali Batra & Ashima Kalia, 2016. "Rethinking and Redefining the Determinants of Corporate Profitability," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(4), pages 921-933, August.
    4. Zdeňka Žáková Kroupová & Gabriela Trnková & Monika Roman, 2022. "Is Market Power or Efficiency behind Economic Performance? The Case of the Czech Food Processing Industry," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gillen, David W. & Oum, Tae H. & Tretheway, Michael W., 2020. "Entry Barriers and Anti-Competitive Behaviour in a Deregulated Canadian Airline Market," Papers 305967, Canadian Transportation Research Forum (CTRF).
    2. Schmalensee, Richard., 1985. "Testing the differential efficiency hypothesis," Working papers 1628-85., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    3. Kennedy, Robert E., 1997. "A tale of two economies: Economic restructuring in post-socialist Poland," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 841-865, June.
    4. Richard D. Wang & J. Myles Shaver, 2016. "The Multifaceted Nature of Competitive Response: Repositioning and New Product Launch as Joint Response to Competition," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 148-162, September.
    5. Gillen, David W. & Oum, Tae H. & Tretheway, Michael W., 2020. "Entry Barriers and Anti-Competitive Behaviour in a Deregulated Canadian Airline Market," 21st Annual Canadian Transportation Research Forum, Vancouver, British Columbia, May 28-30, 1986 305967, Canadian Transportation Research Forum (CTRF).
    6. Thomas, Louis A., 1999. "Incumbent firms' response to entry: Price, advertising, and new product introduction," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 527-555, May.
    7. Fleischer, Manfred, 1997. "The inefficiency trap: strategy failure in the German machine tool industry," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 122877, September.
    8. Fernández, Zulima, 2004. "La competencia dinámica entre pioneros y seguidores: aplicación al sector de la telefonía móvil en Europa," DEE - Documentos de Trabajo. Economía de la Empresa. DB db040805, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    9. Gillen, David W. & Oum, Tae H. & Tretheway, Michael W., 1986. "Entry Barriers and anti-competitive behavior in a deregulated Canadian airline market," Transportation Research Forum Proceedings 1980s 311854, Transportation Research Forum.
    10. Cahill, Sean & Hazledine, Tim, 1989. "Structure, Costs and Performance in Canadian Food and Beverage Industries: Intra-Industry and Inter-Industry Studies," Working Papers 244044, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    11. de Vries, A.G.B. & Pennings, H.P.G. & Block, J.H., 2013. "Trademark or patent? The effects of market structure, customer type and venture capital financing on start-ups' IP decisions," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2013-002-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    12. Chia-Wen Hsu & Homin Chen, 2009. "Foreign Direct Investment and Capability Development," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 585-605, October.
    13. Chang-Yang Lee & Ji-Hwan Lee & Ajai S. Gaur, 2017. "Are large business groups conducive to industry innovation? The moderating role of technological appropriability," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 313-337, June.
    14. Silk Alvin J. & Berndt Ernst R., 2004. "Holding Company Cost Economies in the Global Advertising and Marketing Services Business," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-51, June.
    15. Putsis, William Jr. & Dhar, Ravi, 2001. "An empirical analysis of the determinants of category expenditure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 277-291, June.
    16. Nagler Matthew G., 2007. "Understanding the Internet's Relevance to Media Ownership Policy: A Model of Too Many Choices," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, June.
    17. Boone, J., 2004. "Balance of Power," Other publications TiSEM d3f8cd4b-eaf0-4c1c-aed4-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Faouzi Bensebaa, 2003. "La dynamique concurrentielle:défis analytiques et méthodologiques," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 6(1), pages 5-37, March.
    19. Hałaj, Grzegorz & Żochowski, Dawid, 2006. "Strategic groups in Polish banking sector and financial stability," MPRA Paper 326, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Jackie Krafft & Isabelle Nicolaï, 1995. "Commitment Procedures In R&D Investments : An Examination Of Different Varieties," Post-Print hal-01799270, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:5:y:1989:i:1:p:25-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.