IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v41y2025i1p260-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could trust narrow the intention‐behavior gap in eco‐friendly food consumption? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Rao Yuan
  • Shaosheng Jin
  • Wen Lin

Abstract

There exists a potential gap between individual intention to purchase eco‐products and their actual purchase behaviors, which contributes to low eco‐friendly consumption. The study investigates the intention‐behavior gap in eco‐friendly food consumption, and how consumer trust affects the gap. We focus on consumer trust in eco‐friendly food regulator, manufacturer, certifier, and farmer. Evidence from Chinese consumers reveals that individuals with low trust in the certifier have high intention to purchase green food but fail to make actual purchases. Trust in the manufacturer is positively associated with actual purchases of organic food regardless of intention. We also find that trust exerts the greater impact in bridging the intention‐behavior gap among female, younger, more educated, and more environmentally conscious consumers. Our findings highlight the importance of consumer trust in the certifier and manufacturer. Implications for promoting eco‐friendly food consumption are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rao Yuan & Shaosheng Jin & Wen Lin, 2025. "Could trust narrow the intention‐behavior gap in eco‐friendly food consumption? Evidence from China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 260-288, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:41:y:2025:i:1:p:260-288
    DOI: 10.1002/agr.21886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21886
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/agr.21886?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:41:y:2025:i:1:p:260-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.