IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v3y1987i1p19-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Canadian grain grading system and operational efficiency within the vancouver grain terminals

Author

Listed:
  • D. V. McKeague

    (University of Manitoba, Canada)

  • M. L. Lerohl

    (Professors, Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada)

  • M. H. Hawkins

    (Professors, Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada)

Abstract

The process of commodity grading is carried on to provide market opportunities, or to meet other market criteria. Grading systems also, however, have a cost to those who market a product. This study focuses on the interrelationship among the Canadian grain grading system, the operations of terminal grain elevators at Vancouver, and problems arising from these interrelationships. Evidence indicates the grain grading system affects throughput of the terminal elevators at Vancouver. The present system of grading wheat in Canada slows terminal throughput through delays in unloading, changes to equipment for grain cleaning, and by reducing usable storage space.

Suggested Citation

  • D. V. McKeague & M. L. Lerohl & M. H. Hawkins, 1987. "The Canadian grain grading system and operational efficiency within the vancouver grain terminals," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(1), pages 19-42.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:3:y:1987:i:1:p:19-42
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(198721)3:1<19::AID-AGR2720030104>3.0.CO;2-A
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. French, Ben C., 1977. "The Analysis of Productive Efficiency in Agricultural Marketing: Models, Methods, and Progress," A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Volume 1: Traditional Fields of Agricultural Economics 1940s to 1970s,, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kilmer, Richard L. & Armbruster, Walter J., 1984. "Methods For Evaluating Economic Efficiency In Agricultural Marketing," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Martin, Larry & Richards, Robert R. & Usborne, W.R., 1979. "An Economic Comparison of Alternative Selling Methods for Slaughter Cattle in Ontario," Working Papers 245001, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    3. Spielman, Kimberly & Whipple, Glen & McLemore, Dan, 1982. "Estimation Of A Long Run Average Cost Curve Using A Frontier Function: An Application To The Tennessee Livestock Auction Market Industry," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279185, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Lesser, William H. & Greene, W. H., 1980. "Economies Of Size And Operating Efficiency Of Livestock Markets: A Frontier Function Approach," Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-4, April.
    5. Emerson M. Babb, 1986. "Production and operations management," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(4), pages 421-429.
    6. Charles E. French & Randall E. Westgren, 1986. "Working with other disciplines: The role of agricultural economists in interdisciplinary agribusiness research," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 2(4), pages 491-500.
    7. Stephen R. Koontz & John D. Lawrence, 2010. "Impacts of alternative marketing agreement cattle procurement on packer costs, gross margins, and profits: evidence from plant-level profit and loss data," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 1-24.
    8. Hailu, Getu & Goddard, Ellen W. & Jeffrey, Scott R., 2005. "Measuring Efficiency in Fruit and Vegetable Marketing Co-operatives with Heterogeneous Technologies in Canada," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19507, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Magid A. Dagher & Lynn W. Robbins, 1987. "Grain export elevators: An economies of size analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(2), pages 169-178.
    10. Antle, John M., 1999. "Benefits and costs of food safety regulation," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 605-623, December.
    11. Jones, Eugene & Batte, Marvin T. & Schnitkey, Gary D., 1990. "A Socioeconomic Analysis Of Marketing Information Usage Among Ohio Fruit Producers," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Lesser, William H. & Greene, W. H., 1980. "Economies Of Size And Operating Efficiency Of Livestock Markets: A Frontier Function Approach," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 1-4, April.
    13. Kumarappan, Subbu & Ivanic, Rasto, 2009. "Choice of optimum feedstock portfolio for a cellulosic ethanol plant – A dynamic linear programming solution," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49407, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Akridge, Jay T., 1987. "Productive Efficiency in Multiproduct Firms: The Case of Retail Fertilizer Plants," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 269957, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Brennan, Donna C., 1995. "Economic Issues in Farm-to-Port Grain Storage, Handling and Transport," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(01), pages 1-11, April.
    16. Jabbar, Mohammad A. & Tambi, E & Mullins, G, 1997. "A research methodology for characterizing dairy marketing systems," Research Reports 182903, International Livestock Research Institute.
    17. Piggott, Roley R. & Small, Annette M. & Dumsday, Robert G. & Wright, Vic, 1987. "Short-Run Costs And Throughput Variability For A Nsw Abattoir," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 31(1), pages 1-9, April.
    18. Buccola, Steven T. & Polishuk, Leonard M., 1979. "Cost Structures In Livestock Auction Markets: Average Versus Optimal Efficiency," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 1-10, October.
    19. Farida, Moe & Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z., 2009. "Favoritism and allocative efficiency: a game theoretic approach," 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia 48156, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    20. Eugene Jones & Marvin T. Batte & Gary D. Schnitkey, 1989. "The impact of economic and socioeconomic factors on the demand for information: A case study of Ohio commercial farmers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(6), pages 557-571.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:3:y:1987:i:1:p:19-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.